Gå til innhold

Hva skjuler det seg bak din Ctrl+v?


Anbefalte innlegg

for meg er det uaktuelt og slippe ut fisken igjen! du lager skader i blant annet ryggraden som gir dem vansker med og svømme og skaffe mat.

 

det med fotoapparat kan jo kanskje friste oss noen, men jeg kan ikke tenke meg at noen setter like stor pris på et bildet som en fantastisk middag.

 

hvorfor drepe noe? mener du vi skal spise viltet levende?

 

naturen er slik, man nå drepe for og bli mett!

 

 

 

diskusjon fra en tråd.

Lenke til kommentar
Videoannonse
Annonse

THANK you for your email concerning Amnesty International's position on David Irving's arrest.

 

Amnesty International's position on the issue of 'Holocaust denial' is based on international human rights standards. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) states, in Article 19, that everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression, but that certain restrictions may be placed on that right if they are necessary for the respect of the rights of others; Article 20 states that any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.

 

In line with this and other international human rights standards, Amnesty International works for the right to free expression and adopts as prisoners of conscience people who are imprisoned for exercising their right to freedom of expression, however it will not adopt as prisoners of conscience people who are imprisoned for using hate speech to deliberately or recklessly incite acts of violence, discrimination, or hostility against another group.

 

The language used to advocate hatred is not always explicit or direct. Sometimes it uses euphemisms which, over the years, become well known, such as denying the occurrence of the Holocaust and thereby alleging that the extensive documentation of the Holocaust is fraudulent and that its victims are lying. Since Jews, Roma, gay persons, and disabled persons were the principal victims of the Holocaust and are still subject to discrimination, this can constitute advocacy of hatred and an incitement to discrimination and hostility against those groups.

 

In line with its normal practice, when applying the policy to individual cases, AI [Amnesty International] considers each case on its own merit. In cases where it determines that an individual who has been imprisoned for denying the Holocaust has, in effect, advocated hatred as described above, AI would not adopt them as prisoners of conscience. This is the reason why we will not adopt David Irving as a prisoner of conscience.

Lenke til kommentar

Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere

Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar

Opprett konto

Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!

Start en konto

Logg inn

Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.

Logg inn nå
  • Hvem er aktive   0 medlemmer

    • Ingen innloggede medlemmer aktive
×
×
  • Opprett ny...