Er den siste Bin Laden videoen en forfalskning?

[Kubin]

Jeg hadde ikke sett noe på den før i dag, men kom over denne siden som har et ganske overbevisende argument for at videoen er "falsk" ( Gammel video, tilsatt ny lyd. )

 

"Osama Bin Laden's widely publicized video address to the American people has a peculiarity that casts serious doubt on its authenticity: the video freezes at about 1 minute and 58 seconds, and motion only resumes again at 12:30. The video then freezes again at 14:02 remains frozen until the end. All references to current events, such as the 62nd anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombing of Japan, and Sarkozy and Brown being the leaders of France and the UK, respectively, occur when the video is frozen! The words spoken when the video is in motion contain no references to contemporary events and could have been (and likely were) made before the U.S. invasion of Iraq."

 

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2007/9/9/61032/95401

 

Når en ser på videoen ( linken over har også videoen ) er det virkelig slående at bildet blir "fryst".

 

Sammenligning av bilder. Man ser vel at det er en yngre Bin Laden i den siste videoen? Ikke bare på skjegget (som kunne vært farget), men også på øynene :

 

[Kalinken]

https://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?showtopic=827573

 

 

[Kubin]

Litt om forholdet til Bin Laden :

 

"In George Orwell`s "1984", the enemy of the state is personified in Emmanuel Goldstein. Goldstein is the Osama bin Laden figure of the novel, an elusive figure who is never seen, never captured but believed by all patriotic citizens of Oceania to be an evil genius bent on their destruction. Since Goldstein is never captured, Oceania´s battle against him must never cease. Sometime it wages war on one country said to be aiding the nefarious Goldstein, sometimes on another. The battleground may change but the war never ends. It cannot. The government´s very existence depends upon it."

 

http://www.zmag.org/content/TerrorWar/walkom_war.cfm

 

Dette minner en om et sitat fra Richard Myers.

 

Da det ble klart at Bin Laden hadde unnsluppet fra Tora Bora (Under Afghanistan-krigen) uttalte general Richard Myers : "the goal has never been to get bin Laden."

 

Nå, etter Irak-invasjonen, forstår vi bedre hvorfor det aldri var noe mål å ta Bin Laden :

 

"Had the Americans not let him escape, his capture would have produced psychological closure on the issue of terrorism against America, and made it almost impossible to attack Iraq. As the Iraq attack was already inevitable at the time that the Americans were pretending to try to capture bin Laden, there was no way that they were going to ruin everything by arresting him. They even avoided bombing the area where they knew he was in order to avoid the disaster of inadvertently killing him."

 

 

Og følgende sitat sier jo egentlig dette i klar tekst. (Riktignok er det sagt om Afghanistan-krigen, men like aktuelt for Irak-krigen.) :

 

"Another American official was quoted as making an even more revealing statement, saying that "casting our objectives too narrowly" risked "a premature collapse of the international effort if by some lucky chance Mr. bin Laden was captured.""

 

http://www.pastpeak.com/archives/2004/06/t...tihunt_fo_1.htm

 

"Bin Laden helped Bush's reelection. CIA concluded immediately

after bin Laden's pre-election message that it was designed to help

Bush. According to Suskind, CIA's John McLaughlin immediately

concluded that "bin Laden certainly did Bush a big favor today." "

 

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/40169/

[cFc]

Herregud, han linket jo til den andre topicen som diskuterer akkurat det samme. Akkurat når vi trodde vi hadde overbevist folkene ass.