Goodall Skrevet 16. juli 2007 Del Skrevet 16. juli 2007 Det er navnet på anandtech sin helt konge artikkel. Den tar opp det meste for å si det sånn Finnes her Litt quoting fra artikkelen som er på 16 sider og bør leses We finally have it! After well over a year of asking nicely, rudely and creatively - we know when AMD's next generation microarchitecture is being launched. Well, sort of. Barcelona, as you maybe remember, is the code name for AMD's next-generation server processors. AMD recently announced that in August, it will unleash Barcelona unto the world at clock speeds of "up to 2.0GHz." But Barcelona only applies to the server world, and today we're reviewing a desktop microprocessor, so when do we get to see AMD's brand new Phenom processors on the desktop? We'd expect Phenom in our hands 30 days after Barcelona's launch, making it approximately September/October by the time you'd see a preview/review and widespread availability about 30 days from that. If all goes perfectly, AMD's Phenom chips should be in customers' hands by November or December at the latest. Penryn, Intel's 45nm update to its current Core 2 processors, will also make its debut at the end of this year, potentially spoiling AMD's launch party. A few possibilities exist with Penryn: 1) Penryn could launch across the board at all clock speeds and at competitive prices, quite possibly the worst case scenario for AMD, or 2) Penryn could launch strictly at upper clock speeds/price points, allowing AMD to have an easier time competing at lower speeds, or finally 3) Penryn could launch at lower clock speeds and price points, giving AMD an equally hard time as in the first scenario It's important to recap AMD's impending launch as we've had yet another round of price cuts, making buying a new CPU today very attractive. The Laundry List We're trying to answer the following questions today: 1) Does the 1333MHz FSB have any impact on quad-core performance? 2) Is AMD's Athlon 64 FX-74 competitive with Intel's cheaper Core 2 Quad Q6700? 3) At approximately $180, which is faster: AMD's Athlon 64 X2 6000+ or Intel's Core 2 Duo E6750? 4) At approximately $160, which is faster: AMD's Athlon 64 X2 5600+ or Intel's Core 2 Duo E6550? 5) For $266, should you buy a quad-core Core 2 Quad Q6600 or a dual-core Core 2 Duo E6850? Let's get to it. Og mere bør ikke røpes God Lesing sier nå bare jeg Lenke til kommentar
Smirnoff Skrevet 16. juli 2007 Del Skrevet 16. juli 2007 (endret) Dette diskuteres jo i flere tråder her for tiden. https://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?showtopic=796318 https://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?showtopic=798662 https://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?showtopic=798366 Endret 16. juli 2007 av Smirnoff Lenke til kommentar
ToLi Skrevet 17. juli 2007 Del Skrevet 17. juli 2007 E6850 banker rumpe! Må ha denne Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Start en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå