Swafty Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 Fant dette på nettet, en som har skrevet om denne siden, hw.no. Meste er klager, men kanskje det er noe man burde tenke på? Det er skrevet på engelsk da.. I've reached a point where I feel the need to express my disappointment with Hardware.no. It is worth noting at the outset that I despise everything about Hardware.no. I despise Hardware.no's attempts to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity -- family, class, private associations. I despise how it insists that anyone who disagrees with it is ultimately self-satisfied. Most of all, I despise its complete obliviousness to the fact that it says that the media should "create" news rather than report it. You know, it can lie as much as it wants but it can't change the facts. If it could, it'd obviously prevent anyone from hearing that I have a plan to celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth. I call this plan "Operation investigate the development of animalism as a concept". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that Hardware.no's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are its promises. In fact, Hardware.no has been deluding people into believing that going through the motions of working is the same as working. Don't let it delude you, too. Hardware.no is bad enough when it's alone, but it is even worse when it's joined by brown-nosing wankers. Hardware.no has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and make things worse -- all by trumping up a phony emergency. Misoneism is the answer, but only if the question was, "What's the moral equivalent of letting Hardware.no destroy our sense of safety in the places we ordinarily imagine we can flee to?" While some information provided by Hardware.no's operatives may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or incoherent lamentations. I imagine that Hardware.no's expositors are quick to point out that because Hardware.no is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, it is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, Hardware.no is a victim of its own success -- a success that enables Hardware.no to destroy the natural beauty of our parks and forests. Hardware.no, please spare us the angst of living in a fallen world. One of Hardware.no's emissaries keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that all of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Hardware.no's self-serving animadversions. They are not a cause; they are an effect. In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about Hardware.no's misinformed behavior, but about the way that if I am correctly informed, the essence of lying is in deception, not in words. In any case, I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to create greater public understanding of the damage caused by Hardware.no's homilies. Hardware.no is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. Hardware.no recently went through a nepotism phase in which it tried repeatedly to seize control over where we eat, sleep, socialize, and associate with others. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of its has entirely passed. My evidence is that Hardware.no is locked into its present course of destruction. It does not have the interest or the will to change its fundamentally ridiculous initiatives. I have absolutely no idea why Hardware.no makes such a big fuss over classism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that it may seem difficult at first to carry out this matter to the full extent of the law. It is. But responsibility is an alien concept to Hardware.no. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Hardware.no finds a way to make our country spiritually blind. Many people respond to Hardware.no's unprincipled, shambolic cop-outs in much the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we expand people's understanding of Hardware.no's brutish, power-drunk belief systems. Before Hardware.no initiated an academicism flap to help promote its anal-retentive harangues, people everywhere were expected to tell it how wrong it is. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Hardware.no's associates' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. While I claim that Hardware.no has every right to its slaphappy opinions, it is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to attack the fabric of this nation. Hardware.no has endorsed the idea of fatuous antagonism in a number of specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of its mercenaries' decision to do the devil's work. Although headstrong, pushy oligarchs are relatively small in number compared to the general population, they are rapidly increasing in size and fervor. Are you beginning to get the picture here? It takes more than a mass of unenlightened hypochondriacs to deal stiffly with blasphemous derelicts who batten on the credulity of the ignorant. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to tell it like it is. Lenke til kommentar
Anathema Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 Der stod det virkelig mye tullball. Minner om en slik tekst hvor "Insert name here" blir puttet inn i en ferdigskreven tekst. Lenke til kommentar
Arang Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 Det tok meg omtrent 3 sekunder å se at dette bare var forhåndsgenerert møl. EOD. Lenke til kommentar
Arang Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 Ferdig med tråden, kanskje? Lenke til kommentar
Snorre Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 Hadde dette faktisk vært en tekst/innlegg om hardware.no hadde jeg syntes veldig synd på forfatteren bak. Heldigvis er dette noget usannsylig da teksten stinker standard forhåndsskrevet idioti laget for at folk skal slippe å skrive slikt selv. Hurra! Snorre Lenke til kommentar
Swafty Skrevet 23. april 2007 Forfatter Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 (endret) Men admins; dere må vel ta dette i betrakning? Med tanke på mobbin på forumet. Endret 23. april 2007 av Overdox Lenke til kommentar
Rikky Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 Mobbing? Jeg tror ærlig talt ikke så mange tar seg nær av dette. Hvor fant du det, forresten? Lenke til kommentar
drugis Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 stakkars geek, blir mobba på eit internett forum. Lenke til kommentar
danilovic Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 Jeg kjenner fyren, og jeg kan forsikre dere om at det er han som har skrevet det. Daniel Lenke til kommentar
Skarstard Skrevet 23. april 2007 Del Skrevet 23. april 2007 (endret) Fant dette på nettet, en som har skrevet om denne siden, hw.no. Meste er klager, men kanskje det er noe man burde tenke på? 8455607[/snapback] Hahahaha, jeg tror du bør lese teksten før du uttaler deg. Endret 23. april 2007 av Skarstad Lenke til kommentar
Swafty Skrevet 24. april 2007 Forfatter Del Skrevet 24. april 2007 Fant dette på nettet, en som har skrevet om denne siden, hw.no. Meste er klager, men kanskje det er noe man burde tenke på? 8455607[/snapback] Hahahaha, jeg tror du bør lese teksten før du uttaler deg. 8456079[/snapback] Orker ikke, står så mye dritt der.. Lenke til kommentar
darkness| Skrevet 24. april 2007 Del Skrevet 24. april 2007 Mobbing på forumet? Det er jo ikke akkurat forumet han skriver om. Det er hardware.no. Ikke det at det står noe annet en møl der uansett. Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Start en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå