esa Skrevet 15. september 2006 Forfatter Del Skrevet 15. september 2006 I see, that might be enough proof there... Thanks for the help!! esa Lenke til kommentar
kyrsjo Skrevet 16. september 2006 Del Skrevet 16. september 2006 You are quite rigth - a heavier object has a higher terminal velocity. The terminal velocity is when the object is falling at a constant speed - so we can invoke Newtons 1'st (?) law - if the velocity is constant or equals zero, the sum of forces are zero. We have two forces here - the gravitational pull, and the air resistance. If we have an object falling downwards, and we define this direction as the x-axis (vertically downwards), we have: sum F = mg - F_a = 0 where F_a is the force due to air resistance - which is pointing upwards (negative x-direction). F_a is not depending on the mass of the object, and a resonable estimate for the size of F_a for a fast-moving object is kv², where k is a constant depending on the size and surface of the falling object. That means our equation now reads: mg - kv² = 0 => mg = kv² Note that this equation is only valid when traveling at constant speed/direction. That means that v is the objects terminal velocity. We can revrite the above equation as: v = sqrt(mg/k) where sqrt(...) means the square root of whats inside the paranthesis. So we see that the terminal velocity actually DOES depend on the mass of the falling object. For a more accurate estimate of air resistance, you may read this short paper (norwegian): http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/fys...otst_notat2.pdf Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Start en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå