Döden Skrevet 23. mars 2005 Del Skrevet 23. mars 2005 ***1/2 / **** Sin City is the most visually inventive comic book adaptation to make its way to a movie screen. While other directors have attempted to remain faithful to the look and "feel" of their source material, Robert Rodriguez has taken things a step further, by using Frank Miller's graphic novels as storyboards and immersing the audience neck-deep in the noir currents of Miller's den of iniquity. It's easy to get lost in Sin City. There's something to appreciate around every corner - the gritty characters, the uncompromising story, and, most of all, visuals to astound and amaze. "Eye candy" doesn't even begin to describe what Rodriguez has accomplished. Black-and-white is the best format for film noir, and Rodriguez recognizes that - not that anyone would mistake this picture, with its kinetic energy and restless camera, for a relic of the '40s or '50s. However, what the director offers here is B&W with bells and whistles. Sin City is full of color flashes - the red of a dress or a woman's lipstick, the blue or green of someone's eyes, the blond of a hooker's hair, the orange of fire, or the yellow of a lowlife's skin. Then there's the blood - and there's a lot of that. Blood is either represented as a florescent white or, more frequently, in its natural color. In fact, it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to describe Sin City using the old cliché, "black and white and red all over." With a movie of this ilk, where the style trumps substance, it's easy to come up with something that engages the eyes more than the mind. Fortunately, that's not the case here. Rodriguez and Miller give us a rogue's gallery of memorable heroes and anti-heroes, and make sure that all three of the film's primary episodes are fast-paced and engaging. There's a little of Pulp Fiction in Sin City, both in the hipness and the sense of discovery. Pulp Fiction provided a bigger jolt, but Sin City isn't far behind. Aside from the decision to shoot in black-and-white, there are plenty of things to announce Sin City as modern-day noir. There's a running voiceover narrative that's about a pulpy as one can imagine, right to the frequent use of the word "dames" to describe women. (Sin City exists out of time, in a world where elements of nearly every decade of the last century are represented in one way or another.) Ties and coats flap in the breeze, with the latter billowing behind running men like bat wings. And nearly every cool character in the film drives a convertible (unless a "flat-top" is specifically requested) and smokes without concern about the health risks. (Of course, for characters that get shot six or seven times, then come back for more, conventional medical issues don't pose much of a problem - although Hartigan has angina.) The movie attracted an impressive array of talent, including some of the biggest up-and-coming names in Hollywood, as well as a few established stars, and one has-been on the comeback trail. A lesser movie with this kind of high-octane cast could have become bogged down by the "spot the star" syndrome, but Sin City engrosses to the point where we're no longer watching actors with names, but the characters they are playing. For example, when we see Elijah Wood, we're not thinking of Frodo Baggins. And Bruce Willis isn't John McClane. More than anything else, that's a testimony to how well Rodriguez does his job. There are three lead male characters - one to anchor each of the trio of episodes that form Sin City's structure. For the most part, these individuals do not cross over and invade each other's stories, although the same cannot be said of the other personalities inhabiting Basin City. Bruce Willis plays Hartigan, a tough-talking cop at the end of a career in a place where honest guys like him are hard to find. Before accepting his pension, however, Hartigan wants to solve one last case and save an 11-year old girl from the clutches of a serial murderer/rapist (Nick Stahl). He succeeds, at least to a point, but pays a terrible price in the process. [...] Resten av anmeldelsen i linken nedenfor... Kilde: http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/s/sin_city.html ---- Jeg gleder meg bare mer og mer. Lenke til kommentar
LarsP Skrevet 23. mars 2005 Del Skrevet 23. mars 2005 Sin City ser jo faktisk meget bra ut. Herlig med en skikkelig god BW-film (jmfr: The Man Who Wasn't There). Lenke til kommentar
Jonnar Skrevet 24. mars 2005 Del Skrevet 24. mars 2005 Har sett trailer for den pa TV, og ma innromme det at den ser litt "rar" ut. Har lyst til a se den. Virker som en bra film. La oss vente og se... Lenke til kommentar
Jonnar Skrevet 24. mars 2005 Del Skrevet 24. mars 2005 Etter a ha sett "Bringing The Graphic Novel To Life" ma jeg si at filmen bare ser enda mer spennende ut... Lenke til kommentar
Cuneax Skrevet 24. mars 2005 Del Skrevet 24. mars 2005 Ja, dette virker spennende. Er litt slapp nå, så: Når har filmen norgespremière? Lenke til kommentar
Döden Skrevet 24. mars 2005 Forfatter Del Skrevet 24. mars 2005 Ja, dette virker spennende. Er litt slapp nå, så: Når har filmen norgespremière? 7. Juli. 1. April i USA. Det sier noe om det norske/europeiske kinomarkedet. Lenke til kommentar
hwknut Skrevet 25. mars 2005 Del Skrevet 25. mars 2005 (endret) Ja, dette virker spennende. Er litt slapp nå, så: Når har filmen norgespremière? 7. Juli. 1. April i USA. Det sier noe om det norske/europeiske kinomarkedet. Herregud. Er jo ikke rart folk laster ned filmer. Endret 25. mars 2005 av hwknut Lenke til kommentar
Jonnar Skrevet 25. mars 2005 Del Skrevet 25. mars 2005 Herregud. Er jo ikke rart folk laster ned filmer. Eller flytter til USA for en stund... Er ikke lenge til 1.april, nei... Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Start en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå