UriasX Skrevet 16. april 2013 Del Skrevet 16. april 2013 Flott å høre tingene fungerte til slutt! Nå faller du dessverre mellom to stoler: 12.8 driverene er best for core 16, men vil medføre at core 17 bruker 1 CPU-kjerne. Derfor anbefales 13.x drivere til core 17 for best ytelse, men det medfører litt dårlig utnyttelse i core 16. Jeg ville prøvd meg med SMP6 på CPU og ellers beholdt resten intakt. Blir samme argument til deg også: siden CPU har hyperthreading er ytelsen på SMP6 og SMP7 ikke så altfor forskjellig. På P7662 (core17) skal 5850 @775 få 8700 PPD. Når det blir mange core 17 prosjekt tilgjengelig igjen så kan jo SMP7 evt SMP8 prøves. Rundt 15K PPD for i7 950 står det i artikkel-kladden vår, ikke oppgitt hvilken klokk. Takk takk Nå ble det så myte forkortelser her at jeg faller litt, ut, nybegynner i F@H verden Hva mener du med SMP6? Hvor stiller jeg på dette? Lenke til kommentar
War Skrevet 16. april 2013 Del Skrevet 16. april 2013 Tipper han mener å buke 6 av 8 cores ved å skrive -smp 6 i parameterene i config. Da har cpu 2 ledige cores til gpuen. Hva folder du med? V7? Lenke til kommentar
Arve1234567890 Skrevet 16. april 2013 Forfatter Del Skrevet 16. april 2013 Beklager, jeg har falt for langt inn i FAH-verden SMP6 betyr at SMP-foldingen bare bruker 6 kjerner. Dette stilles på ved å trykke (i FAHControl) "Configure->Slots->Velg CPU->Edit" og øverst der kan du sette "number of threads", står på -1=alle som standard. Trykk "OK" og "Save" Lenke til kommentar
UriasX Skrevet 16. april 2013 Del Skrevet 16. april 2013 (endret) Tipper han mener å buke 6 av 8 cores ved å skrive -smp 6 i parameterene i config. Da har cpu 2 ledige cores til gpuen. Hva folder du med? V7? Aha, skal teste. Ja har versjon 7.3.6 og satt client-type beta på GPUene. Satt "Number of CPU threads this slot should use" til 6 for CPU nå, så får vi se om det hjelper. Fra før har den ene GPUen kommet seg opp på 6200 og den andre 3800. Får se hva en god natts jobb gir dem Takker for hjelpen så langt! God natt Endret 16. april 2013 av HaakonNordengen Lenke til kommentar
GullLars Skrevet 16. april 2013 Del Skrevet 16. april 2013 Kanskje interresant for foldere: Noctua slipper nye singel tårn kjølere 12cm versjonen skal ikke ha problemer med høye RAM brikker, og 14cm versjonen er garantert å ikke lage problemer på LGA2011. Prisene ser også ut til å bli greie til å være Noctua. Lenke til kommentar
NgZ Skrevet 16. april 2013 Del Skrevet 16. april 2013 Må si jeg har blitt stor fan av disse enkle vannkjølingssettene etter å ha prøvd H20 (tror jeg det var). Kjlingen blir riktignok ikke nødvendigvis BEDRE enn gode luftkjølere, men du får dumpet varmen utenfor kasen og totalt støynivå på maskinen går markant ned. Det er ihvertfall min erfaring. Enkelt vannkjølingskit på CPU, to vifter som dytter foran nede og en som drar ut bak oppe. Viftene kan gå på minimal hastighet takket være vannkjølingssettet og lager ingen hørbar lyd, så da hører man bare radiatorviften eller evt. strømforsyningen. Har fått litt lyst å eksperimentere med egenbygd, men tror jeg drøyer det. Har dessverre måttet skru ned foldingen til å kjøre på fire kjerner, da stuetemperaturen ble ulevelig selv med lufting. :/ Jaja, alle monner drar. Lenke til kommentar
knopflerbruce Skrevet 16. april 2013 Del Skrevet 16. april 2013 Jeg fikk mine A1 ES i posten i dag. Skal se om jeg får testet disse i morgen kan kanskje hoppe opp litt i PPD hvis jeg bytter ut MC'ene som står i pr nå med disse. Lenke til kommentar
Dubious Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 Kjører selv core16 nå, men har kjørt core17 og det er en helt annen verden 1 Lenke til kommentar
Borbra Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 Indeed, men med core16 kan jeg spille og gjøre andre ting samtidig, da den "desverre" bruker lite av GPU. Med core16 ligger min GPU på ca 30%-40% load, men med core17 lå den på nesten 100% konstant. Lenke til kommentar
-alias- Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 (endret) Dette hender ikke ofte, men av og til kommer det ned 2 identiske WUer, noe som skjedde i morges. Dette skal ikke skje og skyldes nok en feil i work-serveren hos SF. Jeg har dårlig erfaring med slike, får som regel ingen poeng for nr. 2, bilde: Endret 17. april 2013 av -alias- Lenke til kommentar
GullLars Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 Jeg kom akkurat hjem til lunch og fant maskinen med 0% prosessorbruk. Det viser seg at det har skjedd noe galt tidligere i dag som jeg ikke merket da jeg hastet til forelesning. Kan noen som har bedre peil ta en titt på loggen og se om dette gir noe mening? I FAH control står SMP core med status Failed. Det ser ut som det er 4 WUs som har hatt EARLY_UNIT_END, men jeg vet ikke om dette er noe med mitt system eller selve WUene. 06:26:22:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 1470000 out of 1500000 steps (98%) 06:32:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 1485000 out of 1500000 steps (99%) 06:32:06:WU01:FS00:Connecting to assign3.stanford.edu:8080 06:32:07:WU01:FS00:News: Welcome to Folding@Home 06:32:07:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.75 06:32:07:WU01:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: RUNNING smp:10 from 171.64.65.75 06:32:07:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:32:08:WU01:FS00:Downloading 960.34KiB 06:32:11:WU01:FS00:Download complete 06:32:11:WU01:FS00:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:OK project:10138 run:14 clone:5 gen:4 core:0xa3 unit:0x0000000a0a3b1e6f514748f64d9b80bb 06:32:11:WU01:FS00:Downloading project 10138 description 06:32:11:WU01:FS00:Connecting to fah-web.stanford.edu:80 06:32:12:WU01:FS00:Project 10138 description downloaded successfully 06:37:51:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Completed 1500000 out of 1500000 steps (100%) 06:37:51:WU00:FS00:0xa4:DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4: 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Finished Work Unit: 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 2908800 from "00/wudata_01.trr": Read 2908800 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:trr file hash check passed. 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Reading up to 1554440 from "00/wudata_01.xtc": Read 1554440 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:xtc file hash check passed. 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:edr file hash check passed. 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:logfile size: 30110 06:38:02:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Leaving Run 06:38:04:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Writing 4498362 bytes of core data to disk... 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Done: 4497850 -> 4325071 (compressed to 96.1 percent) 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4: ... Done. 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:- Shutting down core 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4: 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:0xa4:Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:FahCore returned: FINISHED_UNIT (100 = 0x64) 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:Sending unit results: id:00 state:SEND error:OK project:7809 run:10 clone:284 gen:132 core:0xa4 unit:0x000000cc0a3b1e874e311b7a22050147 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:Uploading 4.13MiB to 171.64.65.99 06:38:05:WU00:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.99:8080 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:Starting 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/GullLars/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a3.fah/FahCore_a3.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 701 -lifeline 4684 -checkpoint 5 -np 10 client-type=advanced max-packet-size=big 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 8784 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:Core PID:7212 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa3 started 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:*------------------------------* 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010) 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Preparing to commence simulation 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations... 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Created dyn 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Files status OK 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Expanded 982876 -> 2035048 (decompressed 207.0 percent) 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=982876 data_size=2035048, decompressed_data_size=2035048 diff=0 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Digital signature verified 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Project: 10138 (Run 14, Clone 5, Gen 4) 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Assembly optimizations on if available. 06:38:05:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Entering M.D. 06:38:11:WU00:FS00:Upload 7.58% 06:38:11:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Mapping NT from 10 to 10 06:38:11:WU01:FS00:0xa3:mdrun returned 255 06:38:11:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=2000000 06:38:11:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=2000000. 06:38:15:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 06:38:15:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:10138 run:14 clone:5 gen:4 core:0xa3 unit:0x0000000a0a3b1e6f514748f64d9b80bb 06:38:15:WU01:FS00:Uploading 2.85KiB to 171.64.65.75 06:38:15:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:38:16:WU02:FS00:Connecting to assign3.stanford.edu:8080 06:38:16:WU01:FS00:Upload complete 06:38:16:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400) 06:38:16:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up 06:38:16:WU02:FS00:News: Welcome to Folding@Home 06:38:16:WU02:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.75 06:38:16:WU02:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY smp:10 from 171.64.65.75 06:38:16:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:38:17:WU00:FS00:Upload 16.67% 06:38:18:WU02:FS00:Downloading 947.91KiB 06:38:20:WU02:FS00:Download complete 06:38:20:WU02:FS00:Received Unit: id:02 state:DOWNLOAD error:OK project:10140 run:97 clone:0 gen:8 core:0xa3 unit:0x0000000e0a3b1e6f5149ee9212844a5d 06:38:20:WU02:FS00:Starting 06:38:20:WU02:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/GullLars/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a3.fah/FahCore_a3.exe -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 701 -lifeline 4684 -checkpoint 5 -np 10 client-type=advanced max-packet-size=big 06:38:20:WU02:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 3344 06:38:20:WU02:FS00:Core PID:7284 06:38:20:WU02:FS00:FahCore 0xa3 started 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:Downloading project 10140 description 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:Connecting to fah-web.stanford.edu:80 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:*------------------------------* 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010) 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Preparing to commence simulation 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations... 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Created dyn 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Files status OK 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Expanded 970150 -> 2021624 (decompressed 208.3 percent) 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=970150 data_size=2021624, decompressed_data_size=2021624 diff=0 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Digital signature verified 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Project: 10140 (Run 97, Clone 0, Gen 8) 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Assembly optimizations on if available. 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Entering M.D. 06:38:21:WU02:FS00:Project 10140 description downloaded successfully 06:38:23:WU00:FS00:Upload 25.76% 06:38:27:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Mapping NT from 10 to 10 06:38:27:WU02:FS00:0xa3:mdrun returned 255 06:38:27:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=2000000 06:38:27:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=2000000. 06:38:29:WU00:FS00:Upload 33.33% 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:0xa3:logfile size=6819 infoLength=6819 edr=0 trr=25 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:0xa3:logfile size: 6819 info=6819 bed=0 hdr=25 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Writing 7357 bytes of core data to disk... 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Done: 6845 -> 2409 (compressed to 35.1 percent) 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:0xa3: ... Done. 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:Sending unit results: id:02 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:10140 run:97 clone:0 gen:8 core:0xa3 unit:0x0000000e0a3b1e6f5149ee9212844a5d 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:Uploading 2.85KiB to 171.64.65.75 06:38:31:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:38:31:WU01:FS00:Connecting to assign3.stanford.edu:8080 06:38:32:WU02:FS00:Upload complete 06:38:32:WU02:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400) 06:38:32:WU02:FS00:Cleaning up 06:38:32:WU01:FS00:News: Welcome to Folding@Home 06:38:32:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.75 06:38:32:WU01:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY smp:10 from 171.64.65.75 06:38:32:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:38:33:WU01:FS00:Downloading 955.24KiB 06:38:35:WU00:FS00:Upload 42.42% 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Download complete 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:OK project:10139 run:93 clone:6 gen:2 core:0xa3 unit:0x000000030a3b1e6f51474bd654ac79e5 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Starting 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/GullLars/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a3.fah/FahCore_a3.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 701 -lifeline 4684 -checkpoint 5 -np 10 client-type=advanced max-packet-size=big 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 5024 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Core PID:6140 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa3 started 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Downloading project 10139 description 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Connecting to fah-web.stanford.edu:80 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:Project 10139 description downloaded successfully 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:*------------------------------* 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010) 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Preparing to commence simulation 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations... 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Created dyn 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Files status OK 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Expanded 977650 -> 2031392 (decompressed 207.7 percent) 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=977650 data_size=2031392, decompressed_data_size=2031392 diff=0 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Digital signature verified 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Project: 10139 (Run 93, Clone 6, Gen 2) 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Assembly optimizations on if available. 06:38:36:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Entering M.D. 06:38:41:WU00:FS00:Upload 51.51% 06:38:42:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Mapping NT from 10 to 10 06:38:42:WU01:FS00:0xa3:mdrun returned 255 06:38:42:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=2000000 06:38:42:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=2000000. 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3:logfile size=6819 infoLength=6819 edr=0 trr=25 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3:logfile size: 6819 info=6819 bed=0 hdr=25 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Writing 7357 bytes of core data to disk... 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Done: 6845 -> 2411 (compressed to 35.2 percent) 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3: ... Done. 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:10139 run:93 clone:6 gen:2 core:0xa3 unit:0x000000030a3b1e6f51474bd654ac79e5 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:Uploading 2.85KiB to 171.64.65.75 06:38:46:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:38:47:WU02:FS00:Connecting to assign3.stanford.edu:8080 06:38:47:WU00:FS00:Upload 59.09% 06:38:47:WU01:FS00:Upload complete 06:38:47:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400) 06:38:47:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up 06:38:47:WU02:FS00:News: Welcome to Folding@Home 06:38:47:WU02:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.75 06:38:47:WU02:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY smp:10 from 171.64.65.75 06:38:47:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:38:48:WU02:FS00:Downloading 960.65KiB 06:38:51:WU02:FS00:Download complete 06:38:51:WU02:FS00:Received Unit: id:02 state:DOWNLOAD error:OK project:10138 run:85 clone:0 gen:6 core:0xa3 unit:0x0000000d0a3b1e6f51474a18e61686c8 06:38:51:WU02:FS00:Starting 06:38:51:WU02:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/GullLars/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a3.fah/FahCore_a3.exe -dir 02 -suffix 01 -version 701 -lifeline 4684 -checkpoint 5 -np 10 client-type=advanced max-packet-size=big 06:38:51:WU02:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 4952 06:38:51:WU02:FS00:Core PID:7804 06:38:51:WU02:FS00:FahCore 0xa3 started 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:*------------------------------* 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010) 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Preparing to commence simulation 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations... 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Created dyn 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Files status OK 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Expanded 983192 -> 2035048 (decompressed 206.9 percent) 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=983192 data_size=2035048, decompressed_data_size=2035048 diff=0 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Digital signature verified 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Project: 10138 (Run 85, Clone 0, Gen 6) 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Assembly optimizations on if available. 06:38:52:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Entering M.D. 06:38:53:WU00:FS00:Upload 68.18% 06:38:58:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Mapping NT from 10 to 10 06:38:58:WU02:FS00:0xa3:mdrun returned 255 06:38:58:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=2000000 06:38:58:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=2000000. 06:38:59:WU00:FS00:Upload 75.75% 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:0xa3:logfile size=6819 infoLength=6819 edr=0 trr=25 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:0xa3:logfile size: 6819 info=6819 bed=0 hdr=25 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:0xa3:- Writing 7357 bytes of core data to disk... 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Done: 6845 -> 2410 (compressed to 35.2 percent) 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:0xa3: ... Done. 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:0xa3: 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:0xa3:Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:Sending unit results: id:02 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:10138 run:85 clone:0 gen:6 core:0xa3 unit:0x0000000d0a3b1e6f51474a18e61686c8 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:Uploading 2.85KiB to 171.64.65.75 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:39:02:WU01:FS00:Connecting to assign3.stanford.edu:8080 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:Upload complete 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400) 06:39:02:WU02:FS00:Cleaning up 06:39:03:WU01:FS00:News: Welcome to Folding@Home 06:39:03:WU01:FS00:Assigned to work server 171.64.65.75 06:39:03:WU01:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY smp:10 from 171.64.65.75 06:39:03:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:39:04:WU01:FS00:Downloading 946.63KiB 06:39:05:WU00:FS00:Upload 84.84% 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:Download complete 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:Received Unit: id:01 state:DOWNLOAD error:OK project:10140 run:37 clone:1 gen:6 core:0xa3 unit:0x0000000c0a3b1e6f5149ed98db7d9091 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:Starting 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:Running FahCore: "C:\Program Files (x86)\FAHClient/FAHCoreWrapper.exe" C:/Users/GullLars/AppData/Roaming/FAHClient/cores/www.stanford.edu/~pande/Win32/AMD64/Core_a3.fah/FahCore_a3.exe -dir 01 -suffix 01 -version 701 -lifeline 4684 -checkpoint 5 -np 10 client-type=advanced max-packet-size=big 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:Started FahCore on PID 8548 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:Core PID:3112 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:FahCore 0xa3 started 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:*------------------------------* 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Version 2.27 (Dec. 15, 2010) 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Preparing to commence simulation 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Looking at optimizations... 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Created dyn 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Files status OK 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Expanded 968835 -> 2021624 (decompressed 208.6 percent) 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=968835 data_size=2021624, decompressed_data_size=2021624 diff=0 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Digital signature verified 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Project: 10140 (Run 37, Clone 1, Gen 6) 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Assembly optimizations on if available. 06:39:07:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Entering M.D. 06:39:11:WU00:FS00:Upload 93.93% 06:39:13:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Mapping NT from 10 to 10 06:39:13:WU01:FS00:0xa3:mdrun returned 255 06:39:13:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=2000000 06:39:13:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Work fraction=0.0000 steps=2000000. 06:39:17:WU00:FS00:Upload complete 06:39:17:WU00:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400) 06:39:17:WU00:FS00:Final credit estimate, 15478.00 points 06:39:17:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:0xa3:logfile size=6818 infoLength=6818 edr=0 trr=25 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:0xa3:logfile size: 6818 info=6818 bed=0 hdr=25 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:0xa3:- Writing 7356 bytes of core data to disk... 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Done: 6844 -> 2416 (compressed to 35.3 percent) 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:0xa3: ... Done. 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:0xa3: 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:0xa3:Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:FahCore returned: BAD_WORK_UNIT (114 = 0x72) 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:Sending unit results: id:01 state:SEND error:FAULTY project:10140 run:37 clone:1 gen:6 core:0xa3 unit:0x0000000c0a3b1e6f5149ed98db7d9091 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:Uploading 2.86KiB to 171.64.65.75 06:39:17:WU01:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.75:8080 06:39:18:WU01:FS00:Upload complete 06:39:18:WU01:FS00:Server responded WORK_ACK (400) 06:39:18:WU01:FS00:Cleaning up Lenke til kommentar
NorthNorway Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 SPM2: HFM skulle vel klare å gi deg info! http://code.google.com/p/hfm-net/ Evt kan du sjekke poengene her http://linuxforge.net/bonuscalc2.php Jau, tror nok at skriptene og forenklete instalasjonen fra [H] kun fungerer på 64 bit!. Hvilken maskinvare snakker vi om forresten? "Kraftige" saker? ja må ta å sette meg inn i dette hehe, vel "kraftige saker" - akkurat det går vel under en eller annen definisjon, den ene laptopen ble produsert i 2004, en harmann kardon edition, så i si ti, var den sikkert kraftig men nei, alle er singelkjerne og 32bit om jeg husker rett er 3 gammle lappiser som blir slengt i kjellern, til folding og bi-varme, derfor fjernstyring forventer ikke noe rekord PPD fra dem, i det hele Lenke til kommentar
Kjetil Lura Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 Haha da har jeg leita frem en gammal "kveps", GTX280 luftkjølt. Ligger å koser seg på 100 grader og vet å lage fra seg lyd. Have fun folding! Har du prøvd å blåse det fritt for støv? Da jeg brukte gtx280 så jeg dem aldri over 80C. Lenke til kommentar
NorthNorway Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 et lite spm, kan v7 clienten styre v6 remote? Lenke til kommentar
CasterAnd Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 Fant en rimelig bra server ganske billig. Spørsmålet er om jeg rekker å kjøpe den før noen andre, da neste gang jeg egentlig får nok penger er til sommeren. Kanskje jeg kan starte opp foldingen igjen med den? ^^ Xenon DualCore 3GHz x4, altså 16 cores. DDR2 ram var det dessverre :L Lenke til kommentar
Crawler123 Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 Har du prøvd å blåse det fritt for støv? Da jeg brukte gtx280 så jeg dem aldri over 80C. Ikke så lenge siden jeg skiftet fra vannblokken tilbake til stock case. Så mye støv er det nok ikke, det kan tenkes jeg har vært slurvete med monteringen. Har vannblokken liggende her en plass, vi får se om ppd tilfredstiller evt. tilbake montering :-) brukte du kortene til å folde? Hvilken ppd kan man vente seg, snitt messig? Takker for alle svar, bra tråd! Lenke til kommentar
-alias- Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 et lite spm, kan v7 clienten styre v6 remote? Jeg skjønner ikke helt spørsmålet, så hvis du kunne omformulere det noe så skal jeg forsøke meg på et svar? Lenke til kommentar
-alias- Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 (endret) For øvrig så fikk jeg ned min første P8105 for en time siden, men den imponerer ikke veldig mye. Den gir 31% bedre PPD enn 8101, 9% dårligere enn 8102, 7% dårligere enn 8103 og 10% ned fra 8104 på min G34 6272 2.4GHz rigg. Dvs. at den ligger nærmest 8103. Bilde: Jeg vil tro at den vil gjøre det ganske mye bedre på Xeon baserte servere, samt MC for G34, men det får vi se snart. Antar at det nå kommer et rush med P8105 slik at de får justert den litt, og håpet er at den blir som 8104 eller bedre. Endret 17. april 2013 av -alias- Lenke til kommentar
Fade1 Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 Hmmm... skal si FahCore 17 gjorde utslag gitt... godt over dobling av PPD Lenke til kommentar
Kjetil Lura Skrevet 17. april 2013 Del Skrevet 17. april 2013 (endret) Ikke så lenge siden jeg skiftet fra vannblokken tilbake til stock case. Så mye støv er det nok ikke, det kan tenkes jeg har vært slurvete med monteringen. Har vannblokken liggende her en plass, vi får se om ppd tilfredstiller evt. tilbake montering :-) brukte du kortene til å folde? Hvilken ppd kan man vente seg, snitt messig? Takker for alle svar, bra tråd! For å si det sånn så husker jeg ikke det i farten. Men det er ikke mye. Jeg har hatt mangen kort til folding, 8800,260,280.285,460,560, og nå 660. Fra 4 serien og til 6 serien er bra til folding.Jeg byttet 460 ut til fordel 660 på grunn av strøm for bruket gikk ned. Endret 17. april 2013 av Kjetil Lura 1 Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Start en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå