A64 3200+ vs. P4 3 Ghz pc800

[s0tarts]

Hvilken cpu yter best?

[ahpadt]

IKKE START EN SLIK DISKUSJON!

 

Admin: Steng

[tbend]

intel hviss den e klokka....

[pskard]

Athlon64 3200+ yter bedre enn P4 3.0 GHz. Så enkelt er det.

 

Les testen av CPU-ene her: http://hardware.no/art.php?artikkelid=3278

[rlz]

Ja, Athlon 64 eier vel på NW og Prescott hardt, ifølge testene

[TheGuard]

Ser her...

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/site/videos/index.html

[snorreh]

Ser her...

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/site/videos/index.html

THG? Spar oss, de har null troverdighet mhp. test av Athlon 64 da de brukte minne med elendige minneinstillinger i sin test

 

Se heller denne skikkelige testen:

http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000315

 

"Currently there is no reason to upgrade to Prescott, as the gaming performance is more or less ok, but many applications report pretty poor results. On top of that, the new Intel CPU gets hot very quickly and requires a well ventilated case. The Athlon 64 3200+ is not always the clear winner in games compared to 3.2 GHz Prescott, but the 3400+ will have little trouble beating the 3.4 GHz Prescott in most benchmarks. Prescott will have to scale incredibly quickly to outperform the Athlon 64, because the latter scales excellently with clockspeed, and we definitely prefer Cool'n'Quiet over Hot'n Prescott!"