Tussi Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april (endret) 0laf skrev (33 minutter siden): Exposed: UNRWA’s Rigged “Independent” Review En (mye) lengre artikkel her -> https://unwatch.org/exposed-unrwas-rigged-independent-review/ ______ A Report on The Extreme Bias of the Colonna Group Investigating UNRWA’s Terror Ties On February 5, 2024, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres announced the appointment of an “Independent Review Group” with the stated purpose of assessing whether UNRWA “is doing everything within its power to ensure neutrality and to respond to allegations of serious breaches when they are made.” The announcement came shortly after 18 top donor states to UNRWA suspended funding to the agency, due to revelations that at least 12 UNRWA staffers participated in the October 7th massacre and that hundreds of the agency’s employees are operatives of Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Catherine Colonna, the former French Minister of Foreign Affairs, was selected to lead the Review Group, which also consisted of the following three Scandinavian research institutions: The Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) in Norway; The Raoul Wallenberg Institute in Sweden, and The Danish Institute for Human Rights. .... A brief examination of all of the parties involved in the review group confirms that they are not unbiased, objective observers. Rather, Ms. Colonna, the three organizations, and many of their staff have previously issued statements, published content, and liked social media posts demonstrating their positive feelings towards UNRWA and its work, often even after the newfound allegations of UNRWA’s links to Hamas post-October 7th, and their animosity towards the State of Israel. .... On February 21, UN Spokesman Stéphane Dujarric said that Secretary-General Guterres named Catherine Colonna to lead the Review Group in order to “reassure those donors who may have doubts.” Likewise, on February 22, Ms. Colonna herself stated that that the entire purpose of her investigation is to ensure that donations to UNRWA continue... Speaking at a UN press conference on February, Colonna said: “The aim of this important and delicate mission, entrusted to us by the Secretary General, is to enable donors, the largest among them, but in fact everyone, to regain confidence, when they have lost it or when they have doubts, in the way UNRWA operates.” These statements confirm that a predetermined outcome to ensure the reinstatement of funding was in mind for both the UN and Ms. Colonna. .... Secretary-General Guterres could have chosen from any number of prominent and credible figures who did not have these conflicts, or prior public prounouncements that take a position on the work of UNRWA. But the UN chose Colonna precisely because they were certain that her findings would “reassure the donors.” The impartiality of the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) concerning UNRWA is undermined by the extreme bias of its publications on UNRWA, and by the litany of pronouncements by numerous of its staff and board members accusing Israel of “apartheid” and “genocide.” --- The leading staff and board members of the Raoul Wallenberg Institute (RWI) routinely have been portraying Israel as uniquely evil. Eight years ago, in 2016, RWI Executive Director Peter Lundberg accused Israel of “apartheid.” --- The Danish Institute for Human Rights has demonstrated a sharp anti-Israel and pro-UNRWA bias, as evident by its public statements, pronouncements of its board members and senior staff, and its sole Palestinian partner organization. For example, DIHR applauded South Africa’s ICJ case that accused Israel of “genocide.” ... In addition, the DIHR’s Palestine partner is the Palestinian Independent Commission for Human Rights (ICHR), a group that hosted at its events members of the US-designated terror groups Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). Multiple staffers of this DIHR partner have voiced support for these terror groups, and its founding members include PFLP members Raja Shehadeh and Raji Sourani. The Director of ICHR’s North Gaza office, Raafat Salha, represented the PFLP at a conference in 2012. Man må kanskje være ekstrem og støtte terror for å kunne forsvare UNRWA ubetinget... jeg er særlig skeptisk til undervisningsmateriellet deres Endret 15. april av Tussi 8 1 Lenke til kommentar
Rhabagatz Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Hungersnøden i Gaza går sin gang. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/15/babies-children-gaza-famine 2 1 Lenke til kommentar
Entern Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Tussi skrev (1 time siden): Man må kanskje være ekstrem og støtte terror for å kunne forsvare UNRWA ubetinget... jeg er særlig skeptisk til undervisningsmateriellet deres Helt naturlig, undervisningsmaterialet deres er vel stort sett Mein Kampf og terrorkurs. 9 Lenke til kommentar
DukeNukem3d Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Rhabagatz skrev (20 minutter siden): Hungersnøden i Gaza går sin gang. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/15/babies-children-gaza-famine Så nødhjelpen som Israel slipper inn kommer ikke frem til de som trenger det? 6 Lenke til kommentar
Ørjanø Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april DukeNukem3d skrev (2 minutter siden): Så nødhjelpen som Israel slipper inn kommer ikke frem til de som trenger det? Det gjør den nok. Men hadde hjulpet mye om Israel slapp inn nok nødhjelp så ikke folk sultet. 2 1 Lenke til kommentar
DukeNukem3d Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april (endret) Ørjanø skrev (15 minutter siden): Det gjør den nok. Men hadde hjulpet mye om Israel slapp inn nok nødhjelp så ikke folk sultet. Det ble nå lagt ut link på at de har sluppet inn langt mer i det siste fra en annen debattant her. Endret 15. april av DukeNukem3d 7 1 Lenke til kommentar
Ørjanø Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april DukeNukem3d skrev (6 minutter siden): Det ble nå lagt ut link på at de har sluppet inn langt mer i det siste fra en annen debattant her. Fra COGAT? Om de så slipper inn mer, slippes det ikke inn nok. I tillegg er det oftest lastebiler med mat som blir hindret. 2 1 Lenke til kommentar
DukeNukem3d Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april (endret) Ørjanø skrev (3 minutter siden): Fra COGAT? Om de så slipper inn mer, slippes det ikke inn nok. I tillegg er det oftest lastebiler med mat som blir hindret. Nei, bekreftet av USA. “The aid has increased and quite dramatically in just the last few days,” Kirby said in an interview with MSNBC. “That’s important but it has to be sustained.” Aid to Gaza has increased dramatically, White House’s Kirby says https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/aid-to-gaza-has-increased-dramatically-white-houses-kirby-says/ Endret 15. april av DukeNukem3d 7 1 1 Lenke til kommentar
Entern Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april DukeNukem3d skrev (35 minutter siden): Så nødhjelpen som Israel slipper inn kommer ikke frem til de som trenger det? Pleier nødhjelp til Gaza å komme frem til de som trenger den da? Den pleier vel vanligvis havne i lomma på Hamas… 8 1 Lenke til kommentar
Populært innlegg Aviene Skrevet 15. april Populært innlegg Del Skrevet 15. april I Danmark ruller det nå opp en skandale... https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2024-04-10-danskeres-donationer-til-gaza-er-endt-hos-hamas-stoetter 9 2 Lenke til kommentar
Entern Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Aviene skrev (Akkurat nå): I Danmark ruller det nå opp en skandale... https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2024-04-10-danskeres-donationer-til-gaza-er-endt-hos-hamas-stoetter Overrasker meg dessverre ikke. 9 Lenke til kommentar
Ørjanø Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april DukeNukem3d skrev (59 minutter siden): Nei, bekreftet av USA. “The aid has increased and quite dramatically in just the last few days,” Kirby said in an interview with MSNBC. “That’s important but it has to be sustained.” Aid to Gaza has increased dramatically, White House’s Kirby says https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/aid-to-gaza-has-increased-dramatically-white-houses-kirby-says/ Hjelper jo lite om det har økt, men ikke er nok. 2 Lenke til kommentar
Entern Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Ørjanø skrev (5 minutter siden): Hjelper jo lite om det har økt, men ikke er nok. Blir visst aldri nok… 6 Lenke til kommentar
0laf Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Hamas makes it clear it doesn't want a ceasefire: On Saturday night, Hamas officially rejected the latest ceasefire proposal. Last night, Ynet quoted a senior White House official who said Hamas rejected a hostage release/ceasefire offer that included "everything it asked for," proving that Sinwar isn't really interested in reaching a deal. Today, N12News, citing senior Israeli officials, reported that Hamas upped its demands and is now only willing to release ~20 hostages in exchange for a six-week ceasefire and is demanding more Palestinian prisoners be released for each freed hostage, as well as the number of terrorists serving life sentences. Hamas also continues to demand the full withdrawal of the IDF from Gaza. 6 1 Lenke til kommentar
Tussi Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april (endret) 0laf skrev (16 minutter siden): Hamas makes it clear it doesn't want a ceasefire: On Saturday night, Hamas officially rejected the latest ceasefire proposal. Last night, Ynet quoted a senior White House official who said Hamas rejected a hostage release/ceasefire offer that included "everything it asked for," proving that Sinwar isn't really interested in reaching a deal. Today, N12News, citing senior Israeli officials, reported that Hamas upped its demands and is now only willing to release ~20 hostages in exchange for a six-week ceasefire and is demanding more Palestinian prisoners be released for each freed hostage, as well as the number of terrorists serving life sentences. Hamas also continues to demand the full withdrawal of the IDF from Gaza. På tide å gå inn i Rafah nå, tilby hamaslederne å dra til Qatar mot en total nedleggelse av våpnene, og hvis ikke fjerne Hamas fra Rafah totalt, vise Iran at nå er deres "hamaskamerater" historie i Israels grenseområder Endret 15. april av Tussi 6 1 Lenke til kommentar
Entern Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Tussi skrev (2 minutter siden): På tide å gå inn i Rafah nå, tilby hamaslederne å dra til Qatar mot en total nedleggelse av våpnene, og hvisnille fjerne Hamas fra Rafah totalt, vise Iran at nå er deres "hamaskamerater" historie i Israels grenseområder Jepp. Og helst finne en måte å avlive topplederne deres som gjemmer seg i Quatar, etterpå. Helst litt subtilt om mulig. 6 1 Lenke til kommentar
0laf Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Tussi skrev (22 minutter siden): På tide å gå inn i Rafah nå... 8 Lenke til kommentar
UglaSukk Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april Analyse fra en som mener Iran har endret spillet med dette angrepet : "But last night, Iran penetrated every missile shield manned and operated by NATO itself, with all the trappings and advanced C4ISR and SIGINT capabilities inherent to the entire Western alliance; from THAAD, to Patriot, David’s Sling, Arrow-3, SM-3, Iron Dome, and even ‘C-Dome’ from Israeli corvettes—not to mention the entire complement of the West’s most advanced A2A defenses flown from F-35s, Typhoons, Eurofighters, and likely much more. (...) Secondly, recall the main fear of Iraqi Scarabs and Scuds back in the day: that they could contain chemical/biological warheads. Iran too could technically load its missiles with all kinds of nasty goodies of this sort: either chem-bio or even unenriched Uranium—which it has aplenty—to create a ‘dirty bomb’. Now that we know it can penetrate Israel easily, Iran could actually wipe the country out with a mass un-enriched nuclear, chemical, or biological attack with these now-proven hyper- or quasi-hypersonic ballistics. That threat alone now presents a psychological Damocles Sword that will act as asymmetrical deterrent or counter to any Israeli Samson Option threat." https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/iran-breaches-anglo-zionist-defenses?utm_medium=email 3 Lenke til kommentar
Entern Skrevet 15. april Del Skrevet 15. april UglaSukk skrev (22 minutter siden): Analyse fra en som mener Iran har endret spillet med dette angrepet : "But last night, Iran penetrated every missile shield manned and operated by NATO itself, with all the trappings and advanced C4ISR and SIGINT capabilities inherent to the entire Western alliance; from THAAD, to Patriot, David’s Sling, Arrow-3, SM-3, Iron Dome, and even ‘C-Dome’ from Israeli corvettes—not to mention the entire complement of the West’s most advanced A2A defenses flown from F-35s, Typhoons, Eurofighters, and likely much more. (...) Secondly, recall the main fear of Iraqi Scarabs and Scuds back in the day: that they could contain chemical/biological warheads. Iran too could technically load its missiles with all kinds of nasty goodies of this sort: either chem-bio or even unenriched Uranium—which it has aplenty—to create a ‘dirty bomb’. Now that we know it can penetrate Israel easily, Iran could actually wipe the country out with a mass un-enriched nuclear, chemical, or biological attack with these now-proven hyper- or quasi-hypersonic ballistics. That threat alone now presents a psychological Damocles Sword that will act as asymmetrical deterrent or counter to any Israeli Samson Option threat." https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/iran-breaches-anglo-zionist-defenses?utm_medium=email Hvilken planet befinner han seg på? »Penetrate easily»? De greide å skade 1 arabisk jente. 5 1 Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Start en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå