Frykter at Norge kan bli dratt inn i «romkrig»

[NTB - digi]

Frykter at Norge kan bli dratt inn i «romkrig»

[BlackArrow]

Fra Flateby:

 

Things have gotten just a little more serious than even this:

 

1. In 2016, with little or no input, Norway's Parliament committed Norway into aiding anti-Syrian "insurgents" - which means people trying to overthrow a government - at a base in Jordan. Although there was the laughable - lying, not naive - pledge that none of these terrorists would attack Syrian troops, that has already happened. 10-12Oct16, I attended the Norwegian Defence University's seminar on whether or not this was legal, refuted the claims it was, and submitted this white paper: https://www.facebook.com/norgesfredsrad/posts/1132558120170199 Neither America or Norway has any legal right to be in Syria at all, now that Russia in Sept. 2015 committed full-bore to annihilating Islamic State cancelling our "Syria unable or unwilling" to deal with IS itself ... also considering that under Hillary&Obama we helped supply/create Islamic State to justify our intervention in the first place.

 

2. I assume also under OPEC oil production quota pressure, Norway is helping to overthrow The Nordic Balance - the Scandinavian *land*mass staying de-militarized even during the worst days of the old Cold War - and is now violating its understanding with Russia that no foreign troops would be permanently stationed here. That is, Norway is already becoming an operational base for offensive *ground* operations against Russia. And militarist "neoconservative" anti-Russian Britain's war-eager defence secretary Gavin Williamson has just announced an increase of British troops for the upcoming anti-Russian military maneuvers in Norway to 8,000, which is a large percentage of the British Army. (According to first-responders, the Skripals exhibited British BZ toxin symptoms, not those of super-deadly novichok. That was a too-obvious false flag attack in run-up to the Douma false flag chemical attack, which was a laughable farce, until Dawn Sturgess's death.)

 

3. The disappearance and apparent murder of WikiLeaks investigative journalist Kamphuis raises the question of whether Norway's government was aware this was going to happen and is therefore complicit in his killing. (Investigators should be interrogating the appropriate Norwegian government officials.) This could also have been the work of a mafiya which has become more powerful in Norway after the also illegal - Appendix B of the Rambouillet Treaty, which I whistle-blew on 14May99 in American academia on H-Diplo and Henry Kissinger did nationally in the 31May99 Newsweek - Kosovo war.

 

4. Putin has cited Allied nuclear missile submarines hiding out in Norwegian fjords and Russian killer subs are off the coast. If a neocon "major war" breaks out, the manpower-poor Russians will go nuclear immediately, and intense radioactive fallout will literally wash all over Norway. (Incredibly, areas in the Dovrefjell are still contaminated from Chernobyl 1986.) According to FFI's Per Brekke, there are fallout shelters for only half of Norway's population - our children and families - now, and you can be certain those aren't stocked with survival supplies, except for the elites. That is, as far as its people, Norway's government is criminally unprepared for the war against Russia it apparently intends to join.

 

As the steward of the Nobel Peace Prize, Norway has the special responsibility to avert/stop war, not to promote it ... and the destruction of the West and our loved ones.

 

(This year, our/America's national security thinktank RAND Corp. testified to Congress that we may now not be able to defeat *either* Russia or China in a neocon "major war," and we have instead managed to militarily *ally* them. Such strategic stupidity cannot be fictionalized.)

[Sandormen]

https://akati.com/hacking-satellites-for-super-fast-anonymous-internet-connection

[BlackArrow]

Oh. BlackArrow signs his comments.

 

My name is Lou Coatney, and as I said jeg bor I Flateby.

[G0RJS955]

Jeg har dårig erfaringer med artikler fra NTB. Denen er intet unntak. Fra denne artikkelen:

>det faktum at satellittene er utstyrt med amerikansk militærutstyr, gjør dem til ordinære mål i krigføring

 

OK, så det er noe med selve satellittene. Helt hva dette utstyret er, kommer ikke frem. Det vises til en kilde, NRK, men hva står der?

 

>Hun er tydelig på at amerikansk militærutstyr gjør disse satellittene til ordinære mål i krigføring.

 

Dette er noe helt annet, for da kan det like gjerne være at det dreier seg om amerikansk utstyr som setter opp samband via satellittene . Og fortsatt er det lite analyse å spore.

 

Og når ble satellitter ordinære mål i en krig?

[funkweb]

Og når ble satellitter ordinære mål i en krig?

Godt spørmål, mer enn bare et satellitt?