Redaksjonen. Skrevet 23. oktober 2017 Del Skrevet 23. oktober 2017 Overgår alle menneskelige eksperter og andre algoritmer.AlphaGo beviser: Kunstig intelligens blir bedre uten ekspertise fra mennesker Lenke til kommentar
Mr Burns Skrevet 24. oktober 2017 Del Skrevet 24. oktober 2017 (endret) Når jeg leser om hvordan AlphaGo Zero fungerer så tenker jeg på Douglas Adams bok "Mostly harmless", der noenlunde samme framgangsmåte ble beskrevet:Anything that thinks logically can be fooled by something else which thinks at least as logically as it does. The easiest way to fool a completely logical robot is to feed it the same stimulus sequence over and over again so it gets locked in a loop. This was best demonstrated by the famous Herring Sandwich experiments conducted millennia ago at MISPWOSO (The MaxiMegalon Institute of Slowly and Painfully Working Out the Surprisingly Obvious). A robot was programmed to believe that it liked herring sandwiches. This was actually the most difficult part of the whole experiment. Once the robot had been programmed to believe that it liked herring sandwiches, a herring sandwich was placed in front of it. Whereupon the robot thought to itself, “Ah! A herring sandwich! I like herring sandwiches.” It would then bend over and scoop up the herring sandwich in its herring sandwich scoop, and then straighten up again. Unfortunately for the robot, it was fashioned in such a way that the action of straightening up caused the herring sandwich to slip straight back off its herring sandwich scoop and fall on to the floor in front of the robot. Whereupon the robot thought to itself, “Ah! A herring sandwich..., etc., and repeated the same action over and over and over again. The only thing that prevented the her- ring sandwich from getting bored with the whole damn business and crawling off in search of other ways of passing the time was that the herring sandwich, being just a bit of dead fish between a couple of slices of bread, was marginally less alert to what was going on than was the robot. The scientists at the Institute thus discovered the driving force behind all change, development and innovation in life, which was this: herring sandwiches. They published a paper to this effect, which was widely criticised as being extremely stupid. They checked their figures and realised that what they had actually discovered was “boredom’, or rather, the practical function of boredom. In a fever of excitement they then went on to discover other emotions, Like “irritability’, “depression’, “reluctance’, “ickiness” and so on. The next big breakthrough came when they stopped using herring sandwiches, whereupon a whole welter of new emotions became suddenly available to them for study, such as “relief’, “joy’, “friskiness’, “appetite’, “satisfaction’, and most important of all, the desire for “happiness’. This was the biggest breakthrough of all.Vast wodges of complex computer code governing robot behaviour in all possible contingencies could be replaced very simply. All that robots needed was the capacity to be either bored or happy, and a few conditions that needed to be satisfied in order to bring those states about. They would then work the rest out for themselves. Genialt, ikke sant! Endret 24. oktober 2017 av Mr Burns 6 Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Start en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå