Hvorfor tror folk på konspirasjonsteorier?

[clink]

Det evige trikset å ty til begrepet konspirasjonsteori vil nok misbrukes mang en gang i fremtiden også.
Begrepet er nok ikke like effektivt for å kneble sannheten som det opprinnelig var.

Her er en fin kommentar som sier litt om tiden vi er i.
(1 av 3600 kommentarer på en drøyt uke gammel Twin-tower-artikkel)


Skrevet av Amos Moses • 3 days ago
The Tide is Turning: The Official Story Is Now The Conspiracy Theory
By Paul Craig Roberts on September 7, 2016
The question is: who are the real conspiracy kooks, the majority who disbelieve the official lies or the minority who believe the official lies?

In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of 9/11, and this November 13 will be the 53rd anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. These two state crimes against democracy destroyed American democracy, accountable government, and the Constitution’s protections of civil liberty.

Years after the damage done by these events the American people no longer believe the official stories. Neither does the government, but the government will never validate the distrust that Americans now share of “their” government by acknowledging the truth.

The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the government’s story. The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as “conspiracy theorists.”

The CIA’s psych warfare against the public succeeded at the time and for a number of years during which witnesses had mysterious deaths and the trail grew cold. But by the late 1970s there was so much public skepticism of the official story that the US Congress took the risk of being labeled “conspiracy kooks.” The House Select Committee on Assassinations reopened the inquiry into JFK’s murder. The House Committee concluded that the Warren Commission’s investigation was seriously flawed, that there was more than one person firing at President Kennedy and that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK.

The corrupt US Department of Justice (sic) contradicted the House Select Committee’s report. However, the American people believed the Select Committee and not the corrupt Justice (sic) Department, which never tells the truth about anything.

By 2013 polls showed that most Americans are “conspiracy kooks” who do not believe the official government line on JFK’s assassination. So with regard to JFK’s assassination, the “conspiracy theorists” are in the majority. The minority are the Americans who cannot escape their brainwashing.




Kommentaren ligger under denne nylig postede artikkelen, som også er vel verdt å få med seg:

9/11 conspiracy gets support from physicists' study
Europhysics magazine report finds Twin Towers brought down by 'controlled demolition'

"Now, however, Europhysics Magazine, the respected publication of the European physics community, has published a report by four experts who say “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”"

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/911-conspiracy-gets-support-from-physicists-study/
 

Endret 11. september 2016 av clink

[jjkoggan]

 

Det evige trikset å ty til begrepet konspirasjonsteori vil nok misbrukes mang en gang i fremtiden også.

Begrepet er nok ikke like effektivt for å kneble sannheten som det opprinnelig var.

 

Her er en fin kommentar som sier litt om tiden vi er i.

(1 av 3600 kommentarer på en drøyt uke gammel Twin-tower-artikkel)

 

 

Skrevet av Amos Moses • 3 days ago

The Tide is Turning: The Official Story Is Now The Conspiracy Theory

By Paul Craig Roberts on September 7, 2016

The question is: who are the real conspiracy kooks, the majority who disbelieve the official lies or the minority who believe the official lies?

 

In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of 9/11, and this November 13 will be the 53rd anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. These two state crimes against democracy destroyed American democracy, accountable government, and the Constitution’s protections of civil liberty.

 

Years after the damage done by these events the American people no longer believe the official stories. Neither does the government, but the government will never validate the distrust that Americans now share of “their” government by acknowledging the truth.

 

The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the government’s story. The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as “conspiracy theorists.”

 

The CIA’s psych warfare against the public succeeded at the time and for a number of years during which witnesses had mysterious deaths and the trail grew cold. But by the late 1970s there was so much public skepticism of the official story that the US Congress took the risk of being labeled “conspiracy kooks.” The House Select Committee on Assassinations reopened the inquiry into JFK’s murder. The House Committee concluded that the Warren Commission’s investigation was seriously flawed, that there was more than one person firing at President Kennedy and that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK.

 

The corrupt US Department of Justice (sic) contradicted the House Select Committee’s report. However, the American people believed the Select Committee and not the corrupt Justice (sic) Department, which never tells the truth about anything.

 

By 2013 polls showed that most Americans are “conspiracy kooks” who do not believe the official government line on JFK’s assassination. So with regard to JFK’s assassination, the “conspiracy theorists” are in the majority. The minority are the Americans who cannot escape their brainwashing.

 

 

 

 

Kommentaren ligger under denne nylig postede artikkelen, som også er vel verdt å få med seg:

 

9/11 conspiracy gets support from physicists' study

Europhysics magazine report finds Twin Towers brought down by 'controlled demolition'

 

"Now, however, Europhysics Magazine, the respected publication of the European physics community, has published a report by four experts who say “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”"

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/911-conspiracy-gets-support-from-physicists-study/

 

Dette er feil tråd for å diskutere konspirasjonteorier. Dette dreier seg rundt grunnen til at noen tror på teoriene

[clink]

 

Det evige trikset å ty til begrepet konspirasjonsteori vil nok misbrukes mang en gang i fremtiden også.

Begrepet er nok ikke like effektivt for å kneble sannheten som det opprinnelig var.

 

Her er en fin kommentar som sier litt om tiden vi er i.

(1 av 3600 kommentarer på en drøyt uke gammel Twin-tower-artikkel)

 

 

Skrevet av Amos Moses • 3 days ago

The Tide is Turning: The Official Story Is Now The Conspiracy Theory

By Paul Craig Roberts on September 7, 2016

The question is: who are the real conspiracy kooks, the majority who disbelieve the official lies or the minority who believe the official lies?

 

In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of 9/11, and this November 13 will be the 53rd anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. These two state crimes against democracy destroyed American democracy, accountable government, and the Constitution’s protections of civil liberty.

 

Years after the damage done by these events the American people no longer believe the official stories. Neither does the government, but the government will never validate the distrust that Americans now share of “their” government by acknowledging the truth.

 

The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the government’s story. The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as “conspiracy theorists.”

 

The CIA’s psych warfare against the public succeeded at the time and for a number of years during which witnesses had mysterious deaths and the trail grew cold. But by the late 1970s there was so much public skepticism of the official story that the US Congress took the risk of being labeled “conspiracy kooks.” The House Select Committee on Assassinations reopened the inquiry into JFK’s murder. The House Committee concluded that the Warren Commission’s investigation was seriously flawed, that there was more than one person firing at President Kennedy and that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK.

 

The corrupt US Department of Justice (sic) contradicted the House Select Committee’s report. However, the American people believed the Select Committee and not the corrupt Justice (sic) Department, which never tells the truth about anything.

 

By 2013 polls showed that most Americans are “conspiracy kooks” who do not believe the official government line on JFK’s assassination. So with regard to JFK’s assassination, the “conspiracy theorists” are in the majority. The minority are the Americans who cannot escape their brainwashing.

 

 

 

 

Kommentaren ligger under denne nylig postede artikkelen, som også er vel verdt å få med seg:

 

9/11 conspiracy gets support from physicists' study

Europhysics magazine report finds Twin Towers brought down by 'controlled demolition'

 

"Now, however, Europhysics Magazine, the respected publication of the European physics community, has published a report by four experts who say “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”"

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/911-conspiracy-gets-support-from-physicists-study/

Dette er feil tråd for å diskutere konspirasjonteorier. Dette dreier seg rundt grunnen til at noen tror på teoriene

 

 

Det har selvfølgelig med selve sakene å gjøre.

Det er en naturlig sammenheng med hva sakene inneholder og hvorfor man tror på dem.

Store konspirasjoner er gigantisk maktspill og store krefter involvert i å få en agenda til å se ut som noe annet, bl.a. ved å bruke mye ressurser på desinformasjon, som ved å konsekvent kalle folk som nærmer seg sannheten for konspirasjonsteoretikere.

 

Skal man diskutere konspirasjonsteorier så ser jeg ikke hvordan det skal gjøres uten å gå litt inn i selve sakene.

Folk har etter hvert fått tilgang til andre kilder enn bare mainstream media og flere lar seg derfor ikke lenger lure.

 

False flag, psyop (psykologisk operasjon) mm. er ikke lenger ukjente triks kontrollert av mediene.

Endret 12. september 2016 av clink

[Gjest Slettet+6132]

Ignorance ,Blir overbevist om noe + Cognitiv bias/tunellsyn.

Samme grunn til at folk tror at healing over telefon virker, at en kan prate med de døde eller at Jesus gjorde om vann til vin.

[αкαѕнα]

det er mange grunner til at man ikke tror på ting... det er ofte grunnet i at man ikke føler historien passer med hendelsene.

 

 

http://tapnewswire.com/2016/03/53-admitted-false-flag-attacks/

[Augusta08]

Gammel tråd ser jeg, men dette har jo ikke akkurat blitt mindre aktuelt.

Jeg tror det beror mye på behovet av å kunne mestre noe.

Jeg har hatt med slike personer å gjøre, også ganske nært og over lang tid.

De er ganske gode på å involvere mennesker rundt seg, og man KAN lure på om det egentlig er en selv som har visst så lite så lenge.

Med fare for å stigmatisere; en del av disse menneskene har gjerne lite annet I livet. Det bunner i materielle mangler, dårlig kontakt med sine, iblant en fortid som ikke er noe å gå videre med. Selvhevdelsesbehovet, ønsket om at "alt vi trenger er moder jord og rent vann" blir veldig sterkt. Ser den senere tid at sjamanisme er høyaktuelt. Sjaman betyr "den som vet".

Igjen; en mulighet til å hevde seg. I det minste overfor de som biter på.

Det forekommer gjerne at de tror på teorier som ikke stemmer overens med hverandre, og at angrep blir beste forsvar, dersom noen stiller spørsmål ved realiteten i påstandene deres. Umodent i seg selv.

Mer alvorlig er det at de fornekter og benekter hendelser som skjer og har skjedd i verden, kun for egen vinning.

En stygg utvikling.