Gå til innhold

Israel eller Palestina?


  

221 stemmer

  1. 1. Israel Eller Palestina

    • Israel
      119
    • Palestina
      102


Anbefalte innlegg

 

De to første jeg tenkte på, men når jeg hører han snakke på den på C-Span videoen så er det bra hårreisende de utsagnene han kommer med, fyren er jo tydeligvis ikke helt god i topplokket.

Dine subjektive meninger.

Basert på sunn fornuft, jeg liker sunn fornuft for det er fornuftig.

 

Fra rundt 8 minutter: "Israel's right to exist lies in that Israel created itself out of nothing. Its founders created a free country, in a region dominated by totaliatarian, corrupt regimes. Israel's right to exist is based on its moral standing."

Veldig enig i dette.

Ifølge den logikken så er det helt greit at stater og organisasjoner kan invadere, annektere og overdra landområder samt fortrenge populasjoner etter eget forgodtbefinnende. Det er jaggu meg litt av et moralsk standpunkt.

 

 

Tenkt litt på dette utsagnet her og hvor sinnssykt der er. Det vitner om en grenseløs maktarroganse. Israel leker kappe-land for så å ta plass i den moralske høyborgen, ironien er sitrende.

Men ingen gode argumenter i mot det han sier...

Du forstår ikke basisen for hvorfor han sier dette, derfor høres det for deg galt ut.

Du må se hele i sin rette kontekst.

Jada, historien er fulle av folk og stater som "rettferdiggjorde" sine handlinger. Det er en typisk "hadde-du-bare-vært-meg" mentalitet. Det bunner ikke ut i annet enn etnosentrisme. Vi har sett det før i fra britisk imperialisme til apartheid iSør-Afrika.

 

Med slike holdninger, der Israel presenterer seg selv som en moralsk overlegen hersker og behandler de menneskene som har bodd der i tusenvis av år som annenrangs borgere blir det aldri fred.

De fleste menneskene i Israel, om ikke alle, blir behandlet likt. Det er likhet for loven blant annet. Demokrati osv, er moralsk overlegent diktatur og sharialovgivning. Det som skjer i Israel er vekst og velstand for de fleste som bor der.

 

Israel er en apartheid stat. Det nytter ikke å påberope seg demokrati dersom man ikke klarer å etterleve demokratiske prinsipper. Endret av Milmo
Lenke til kommentar
Videoannonse
Annonse

UN Resolution 181

http://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/0/7F0AF2BD897689B785256C330061D253

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_General_Assembly_Resolution_181

 

Sitatfusk (fordi det ikke er hele teksten, men jeg har kopiert disse to kaptitlene i sin helhet):

Chapter 2

Religious and Minority Rights

1. Freedom of conscience and the free exercise of all forms of worship, subject only to the maintenance of public order and morals, shall be ensured to all.

2. No discrimination of any kind shall be made between the inhabitants on the ground of race, religion, language or sex.

3. All persons within the jurisdiction of the State shall be entitled to equal protection of the laws.

4. The family law and personal status of the various minorities and their religious interests, including endowments, shall be respected.

5. Except as may be required for the maintenance of public order and good government, no measure shall be taken to obstruct or interfere with the enterprise of religious or charitable bodies of all faiths or to discriminate against any representative or member of these bodies on the ground of his religion or nationality.

6. The State shall ensure adequate primary and secondary education for the Arab and Jewish minority, respectively, in its own language and its cultural traditions.

The right of each community to maintain its own schools for the education of its own members in its own language, while conforming to such educational requirements of a general nature as the State may impose, shall not be denied or impaired. Foreign educational establishments shall continue their activity on the basis of their existing rights.

7. No restriction shall be imposed on the free use by any citizen of the State of any language in private intercourse, in commerce, in religion, in the Press or in publications of any kind, or at public meetings.3/

8. No expropriation of land owned by an Arab in the Jewish State (by a Jew in the Arab State)4/ shall be allowed except for public purposes. In all cases of expropriation full compensation as fixed by the Supreme Court shall be paid previous to dispossession.

Chapter 3

Citizenship, international conventions and financial obligations

1. Citizenship. Palestinian citizens residing in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem, as well as Arabs and Jews who, not holding Palestinian citizenship, reside in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem shall, upon the recognition of independence, become citizens of the State in which they are resident and enjoy full civil and political rights. Persons over the age of eighteen years may opt, within one year from the date of recognition of independence of the State in which they reside, for citizenship of the other State, providing that no Arab residing in the area of the proposed Arab State shall have the right to opt for citizenship in the proposed Jewish State and no Jew residing in the proposed Jewish State shall have the right to opt for citizenship in the proposed Arab State. The exercise of this right of option will be taken to include the wives and children under eighteen years of age of persons so opting.

Arabs residing in the area of the proposed Jewish State and Jews residing in the area of the proposed Arab State who have signed a notice of intention to opt for citizenship of the other State shall be eligible to vote in the elections to the Constituent Assembly of that State, but not in the elections to the Constituent Assembly of the State in which they reside.

2. International conventions. (a) The State shall be bound by all the international agreements and conventions, both general and special, to which Palestine has become a party. Subject to any right of denunciation provided for therein, such agreements and conventions shall be respected by the State throughout the period for which they were concluded.

(b) Any dispute about the applicability and continued validity of international conventions or treaties signed or adhered to by the mandatory Power on behalf of Palestine shall be referred to the International Court of Justice in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the Court.

3. Financial obligations. (a) The State shall respect and fulfil all financial obligations of whatever nature assumed on behalf of Palestine by the mandatory Power during the exercise of the Mandate and recognized by the State. This provision includes the right of public servants to pensions, compensation or gratuities.

(b) These obligations shall be fulfilled through participation in the Joint economic Board in respect of those obligations applicable to Palestine as a whole, and individually in respect of those applicable to, and fairly apportionable between, the States.

© A Court of Claims, affiliated with the Joint Economic Board, and composed of one member appointed by the United Nations, one representative of the United Kingdom and one representative of the State concerned, should be established. Any dispute between the United Kingdom and the State respecting claims not recognized by the latter should be referred to that Court.

(d) Commercial concessions granted in respect of any part of Palestine prior to the adoption of the resolution by the General Assembly shall continue to be valid according to their terms, unless modified by agreement between the concession-holder and the State.

 

 

Her er en liste over alle FN resolusjonene vedr Israel/Palestina:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_UN_resolutions_concerning_Israel_and_Palestine

Endret av gunleik groven
  • Liker 2
Lenke til kommentar

Ben Gurion:

  • In our political argument abroad, we minimize Arab opposition to us. But let us not ignore the truth among ourselves. I insist on the truth, not out of respect for scientific but political realities. The acknowledgement of this truth leads to inevitable and serious conclusions regarding our work in Palestine… let us not build on the hope the terrorist gangs will get tired. If some get tired, others will replace them.
    A people which fights against the usurpation of its land will not tire so easily... it is easier for them to continue the war and not get tired than it is for us... The Palestinian Arabs are not alone. The Syrians are coming to help. From our point of view, they are strangers; in the point of law they are foreigners; but to the Arabs, they are not foreigners at all ... The centre of the war is in Palestine, but its dimensions are much wider. When we say that the Arabs are the aggressors and we defend ourselves — this is only half the truth. As regards our security and life we defend ourselves and our moral and physical position is not bad. We can face the gangs... and were we allowed to mobilize all our forces we would have no doubts about the outcome... But the fighting is only one aspect of the conflict which is in its essence a political one. And politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves. Militarily, it is we who are on the defensive who have the upper hand but in the political sphere they are superior. The land, the villages, the mountains, the roads are in their hands. The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country, while we are still outside. They defend bases which are theirs, which is easier than conquering new bases... let us not think that the terror is a result of Hitler's or Mussolini's propaganda — this helps but the source of opposition is there among the Arabs.
    • Address at the Mapai Political Committee (7 June 1938) as quoted in Flapan, Simha, 1979.

 

 

"If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?"
David Ben-Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121.

"We must do everything to insure they (the Palestinians) never do return.”
David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar's Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.

 

Og som jeg har nevnt, forteller denne statistikken mye av det samme, bare med tall:
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Society_&_Culture/israel_palestine_pop.html

 

Er det en start?

Endret av gunleik groven
  • Liker 3
Lenke til kommentar

Israel er en apartheid stat. Det nytter ikke å påberope seg demokrati dersom man ikke klarer å etterleve demokratiske prinsipper.

MYTH 2: ISRAEL IS AN APARTHEID STATE

The term Apartheid refers to the segregation of groups on the basis of ethnicity or race, and the denial of basic civil rights to the segregated group. There is no such segregation in Israel. Arabs are granted full civil rights under Israeli law, which forbids discrimination on the basis of race, creed, or sex. Arabs take part fully in Israeli society and government. Arab citizens of Israel vote in national elections, have representatives in the Israeli Parliament, sit on the Israeli courts and on the Israeli Supreme Court benches, and serve as tenured professors teaching in Israeli colleges and universities. The Arab citizens of Israel have more rights, and enjoy more freedom, education, and economic opportunity than the Arabs of any Arab state.

 

 

http://www.wall-of-truth.org/myths/

Fant også denne på den kilden som gunleik bruker en del her:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Human_Rights/Israel_&_apartheid.html

 

Fant også denne:

Endret av turbonello
  • Liker 1
Lenke til kommentar

Tja... noe slikt som 80% av norske journalister er sympatiske til AP, SV og Rødt. Så vidt jeg husker 0 til FRP og KRF som er de eneste to Israel-partiene i Norge.

Are Jews skewing the news? Tvilsomt.

Are the left-wing skewing the news? Most definitely.

Lenke til kommentar

 

 

 

https://www. youtube. com/ watch?v=ccenVc7Bq5Q

Frinkelstein... Frankenstain. :)

 

Er du uenig i hans standpunkt her?

 

Han sier veldig mye. Hva tenker du spesielt på?

 

 

Det var du som postet videoen så da antar jeg du er uenig. Jeg synes han svarer godt for seg på et ladet spørsmål. Jeg synes han har et veldig godt poeng.

  • Liker 2
Lenke til kommentar

Litt uærlig av artikkelforfatteren å poengtere at Hamas angivelig ikke skjøt tidligere og at Israels angrep dermed ikke kunne være selvforsvar, uten å nevne rakettene og granatene som faktisk ble avfyrt mot Israel fra Gaza.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel,_2014

 

Throughout June about 53 rockets and a mortar shell were launched from Gaza in about 17 attacks towards Israel. These attacks caused property damage, but no deaths or injuries.

 

 

 

Det er med andre ord åpenbart at Tarek Restan bevisst velger å formidle ett bilde han forhåpentligvis vet er feil. Særlig når han fremstiller det som Israel den 30. Juni skjøt først og uprovosert når realiteten er at det gjennom måneden allerede var blitt avfyrt 53 raketter og granater fra Gaza.

Lenke til kommentar

Litt uærlig av artikkelforfatteren å poengtere at Hamas angivelig ikke skjøt tidligere og at Israels angrep dermed ikke kunne være selvforsvar, uten å nevne rakettene og granatene som faktisk ble avfyrt mot Israel fra Gaza.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel,_2014

 

Throughout June about 53 rockets and a mortar shell were launched from Gaza in about 17 attacks towards Israel. These attacks caused property damage, but no deaths or injuries.

 

 

 

Det er med andre ord åpenbart at Tarek Restan bevisst velger å formidle ett bilde han forhåpentligvis vet er feil. Særlig når han fremstiller det som Israel den 30. Juni skjøt først og uprovosert når realiteten er at det gjennom måneden allerede var blitt avfyrt 53 raketter og granater fra Gaza.

 

Takk for korreksjon av faktiske feil, om jeg har kommet med det!

Lenke til kommentar

 

Litt uærlig av artikkelforfatteren å poengtere at Hamas angivelig ikke skjøt tidligere og at Israels angrep dermed ikke kunne være selvforsvar, uten å nevne rakettene og granatene som faktisk ble avfyrt mot Israel fra Gaza.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel,_2014

 

Throughout June about 53 rockets and a mortar shell were launched from Gaza in about 17 attacks towards Israel. These attacks caused property damage, but no deaths or injuries.

 

 

 

Det er med andre ord åpenbart at Tarek Restan bevisst velger å formidle ett bilde han forhåpentligvis vet er feil. Særlig når han fremstiller det som Israel den 30. Juni skjøt først og uprovosert når realiteten er at det gjennom måneden allerede var blitt avfyrt 53 raketter og granater fra Gaza.

 

Takk for korreksjon av faktiske feil, om jeg har kommet med det!

 

 

Ikke noe feil fra din side, men selve artikkelen overser åpenbart temmelig mye.

Lenke til kommentar

 

Israel er en apartheid stat. Det nytter ikke å påberope seg demokrati dersom man ikke klarer å etterleve demokratiske prinsipper.

MYTH 2: ISRAEL IS AN APARTHEID STATE

The term Apartheid refers to the segregation of groups on the basis of ethnicity or race, and the denial of basic civil rights to the segregated group. There is no such segregation in Israel. Arabs are granted full civil rights under Israeli law, which forbids discrimination on the basis of race, creed, or sex. Arabs take part fully in Israeli society and government. Arab citizens of Israel vote in national elections, have representatives in the Israeli Parliament, sit on the Israeli courts and on the Israeli Supreme Court benches, and serve as tenured professors teaching in Israeli colleges and universities. The Arab citizens of Israel have more rights, and enjoy more freedom, education, and economic opportunity than the Arabs of any Arab state.

 

 

http://www.wall-of-truth.org/myths/

Fant også denne på den kilden som gunleik bruker en del her:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Human_Rights/Israel_&_apartheid.html

 

Fant også denne:

 

Jeg stoler ikke et fnugg på slike tydelige pro-sionistiske organisasjoner som American–Israeli Cooperative Enterprise.

 

Liker bedre denne videoen av Sherry Wolf, en jødisk uavhengig journalist og menneskerettsaktivist. Her forklarer hun rasjonelt med gode argumenter hvorfor Israel er en apartheid stat, om blant annet kriminaliseringen av Nakba, vedtatt av Knesset. Ett enkelt eksempel på hvordan Israel dekker over sine overgrep ved å kriminalisere en korrekt gjengivelse av historien!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6txhiOtLEM#t=345

  • Liker 1
Lenke til kommentar

OK. Takk. Jeg skal kanskje gå videre på listen...

 

Men hva tenker du?

Jeg tenker at denne saken er komplisert, og at jeg ikke har alle svarene.

Det er også slik at mye av det samme påståes om Israel, som det som blir påstått om Palestina.

Det har vært avtaler som Hamas & Co ikke har godtatt, og det har vært avtaler som Israel ikke ville godta.

Man burde vel da søke å forstå hvorfor vedkommende ikke ville godta avtalen, fordi det er som regel en grunn for at de gjør det. Hva tenker du om saken?

 

Han fyren som Uderzo linket til virker å være en svært oppegående fyr, så jeg har sett flere videoer av han, bl.a. denne. =P

 

 

 

 

 

Endret av turbonello
  • Liker 2
Lenke til kommentar

Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere

Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar

Opprett konto

Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!

Start en konto

Logg inn

Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.

Logg inn nå
×
×
  • Opprett ny...