Gå til innhold
Trenger du tips og råd? Still spørsmål anonymt her ×

Han kommer ikke, hva kan være årsaken?


Anbefalte innlegg

Jeg holder på med en mann i slutten av 30 åra sine, selv har jeg ikke hatt sex på 6 år og første gangen med han for noen uker siden var som å ta jomfruhinna igjen. Det var trangt og vondt og jeg ble ikke ordentlig våt og vi måtte avbryte etterhvert osv.

 

 

Prøvde igjen etter noen dager og jeg åpna meg litt mer så ble forbedring og det håper jeg blir mer og mer bedre jo flere ganger vi holder på.

Men han kommer ikke.. Uansett om han har seg med meg og peiser på lenge så er det ikke et klimaks der han kommer. Ikke når han ronker ved siden av meg heller.

 

 

Han har omskjært forhuden når han var mindre av medisinske årsaker, men kan det ha noe å si da?

 

Han hvisket noe til meg her om natta mens han holdt på med meg og det var noe i denne duren her "når jeg blir litt mer trygg på deg og sånn så.." type ting da hvis dere skjønner.

Men han er jo veldig komfortabel med meg ellers, og har ingen sperrer på noe annet.

Jeg skjønner bare ikke hvorfor han ikke kommer Er det meg, er det min vagina som ikke er i orden eller hva kan dette være og hva kan jeg gjøre for å hjelpe til med dette? Anonym poster: 101a15f9e5009396a5187d05ad8163c1

Lenke til kommentar
Videoannonse
Annonse

Hva om du blir mer aktiv? At han peiser på eller at han skal runke ved siden av deg hjelper jo lite om det er tryggheten som mangler. Ta kontrollen, du runker han, sug han, du sitter oppå. Gjør han kjempekåt først! Klart, det kan være prestasjonsangst, men det blir definitivt ikke bedre om det kun er han som skal fikse "sitt" problem. Hjelp han, gjør det for han :)

Lenke til kommentar

Bortskjæring av forhud fører til veldig nedsatt følsomhet, så dette er nok 90% av årsaken.

 

Circumcision amputates more than fifty percent of the skin and mucosa of the penis and invariably excises the heavily innervated ridged band at the end of the foreskin.[18] Taylor (1996) observed that the ridged band had more Meissner's corpuscles — a kind of nerve ending that is concentrated in areas of greatest sensitivity}}</ref>[18][19][citation needed] — than the areas of the foreskin with smooth mucus membranes. Taylor postulated that the ridged band is sexually sensitive and plays a role in normal sexual function. He also suggested that the gliding action, possible only when there was enough loose skin on the shaft of the penis, serves to stimulate the ridged band through contact with the corona of the glans penis during vaginal intercourse.[20] This gliding action was also described by Lakshmanan (1980).[21]

Boyle et al. (2002) argued that circumcision and frenectomy remove tissues with "heightened erogenous sensitivity," stating "the genitally intact male has thousands of fine touch receptors and other highly erogenous nerve endings—many of which are lost to circumcision."[22] They concluded, "Evidence has also started to accumulate that male circumcision may result in lifelong physical, sexual, and sometimes psychological harm as well."

Schoen (2007) claims that "anecdotally, some have claimed that the foreskin is important for normal sexual activity and improves sexual sensitivity. Objective published studies over the past decade have shown no substantial difference in sexual function between circumcised and noncircumcised men."[23]

Sorrells et al. (2007), in the study discussed above, measured fine-touch pressure thresholds of the penis, and concluded "The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates" (removes) "the most sensitive parts of the penis." According to Sorrells et al., the five penile areas most sensitive to fine-touch are located on the foreskin.[12] This is disputed by Waskett & Morris, (2007) who argue that when they re-analyse Sorrells' data, no significant differences are found; that light touch is only one form of sensitivity, and that sexual pleasure may sometimes require less sensitivity. They also criticized Sorrells' recruitment methods.[13] In response, Young (2007) criticizes Waskett & Morris's use of the Bonferroni correction and argues that the methods of selecting subjects would not affect the results, that the two most sensitive positions on the circumcised penis represent small areas of circumcision scar, as compared to a much larger area of sensitive tissue on the foreskin, and that sales of sensation-dulling products do not necessarily indicate that such are widely used other than on scar tissue.[14]

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (2009) has written that the foreskin "is rich in specialized sensory nerve endings and erogenous tissue."[24] The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (2010) states that "the foreskin is a primary sensory part of the penis, containing some of the most sensitive areas of the penis. The effects of circumcision on sexual sensation however are not clear, with reports of both enhanced and diminished sexual pleasure following the procedure in adults and little awareness of advantage or disadvantage in those circumcised in infancy."[25] The Royal Dutch Medical Association states that many sexologists view the foreskin as "a complex, erotogenic structure that plays an important role ‘in the mechanical function of the penis during sexual acts, such as penetrative intercourse and masturbation’."[26]

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_effects_of_circumcision#Foreskin_sensation

Endret av Aporia Qualia
Lenke til kommentar
×
×
  • Opprett ny...