siDDis Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Del Skrevet 21. juni 2012 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-June/068129.html Yes, we are indeed using FreeBSD at Netflix! For those who are interested, I recently moved from Yahoo to Netflix to help support FreeBSD for them, and I'm definitely impressed with what is going on there. Other than a few small changes, we're using stock FreeBSD 9, tracking the 9-stable branch on a regular basis. Our chassis is a semi-custom 4U 19" form factor with thirty six 3TB SATA disks and 2 SSDs. Each disk has its own UFS+J filesystem, except for the SSDs that are mirrored together with gmirror. The SSDs hold the OS image and cache some of the busiest content. The other disks hold nothing but the audio and video files for our content streams. We connect to the outside world via a twin-port Intel 10GBe optical NIC (only one port is active at the moment), and we use LSI MPT2 controllers for 32 of the 36 disks. The other 4 disks connect to the onboard AHCI SATA controller. All of the disks are direct-attach with no SAS backplanes or expanders. Out-of-band management happens via IPMI on an on-board 1Gb NIC. The entire system consumes around 500W of power, making it a very efficient appliance for its functionality. Netflix is also at the front of the internet pack with IPv6 roll-out, and FreeBSD plays an essential part of that. We've been working hard on stabilizing the FreeBSD IPv6 stack for production-level traffic, and I recommend that all users of IPv6 update to the latest patches in 9-stable and 8-stable. Contact me directly if you have questions about this. That said, we're excited about World IPv6 Day, and we're ready with AAAA DNS records and content service from both Amazon and the traditional CDNs as well as our OpenConnect network. >From an advocacy standpoint, Netflix represents 30% of all North American internet traffic during peak hours, and FreeBSD is becoming an integral part of that metric as we shift traffic off of the traditional CDNs. We're expanding quickly, which means that FreeBSD is once again a core part of the internet infrastructure. As we find and fix stability and performance issues, we're aggressively pushing those changes into FreeBSD so that everyone can benefit from them, just as we benefit from the contributions of the rest of the FreeBSD ecosystem. We're proud to be a part of the community, and look forward to a long-term relationship with FreeBSD. If you have any questions, let me know or follow the information links on the OpenConnect web site. Scott Lenke til kommentar
Sokkalf™ Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Del Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Noen grunn til at de ikke bruker ZFS, med det diskoppsettet? Lenke til kommentar
Zerge Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Del Skrevet 21. juni 2012 ZFS er et volum/filsystem som fungerer ypperlig på 1 host. I skyen derimot, så ser man gjerne på en hel appliance som en brikke i en stor redundant lagringsløsning. Følgelig tror jeg at Netflix benytter et ekstra logisk lag med såkalt "cloud FS" for å samordne alle appliancene. Lenke til kommentar
siDDis Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Forfatter Del Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Nå er jo dette cache servere som plasseres ute hos ISPane. Trenger ikkje ZFS til sånt. Lenke til kommentar
siDDis Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Forfatter Del Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Det som gjer mest inntrykk er at dei ikkje brukar RELEASE, men køyre FreeBSD 9-STABLE med oppdateringar i jevne mellomrom. Det er tøft gjort! Lenke til kommentar
tingo Skrevet 21. juni 2012 Del Skrevet 21. juni 2012 De må jo ha sin egen løsning for å distribuere "sine" deler likevel, da er det sikkert ikke mye ekstrajobb å bruke -stable istedet for release. Og Scott sier jo at de bruker / trenger IPv6, da er det nok viktig å få inn endringer så raskt som mulig. Lenke til kommentar
Anbefalte innlegg
Opprett en konto eller logg inn for å kommentere
Du må være et medlem for å kunne skrive en kommentar
Opprett konto
Det er enkelt å melde seg inn for å starte en ny konto!
Start en kontoLogg inn
Har du allerede en konto? Logg inn her.
Logg inn nå