En teori om flyplass-scannere

[Kubin]

Denne teorien gir faktisk god mening.

 

"Based on the instructions from Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, a directive was reportedly issued by the TSA on 29 October, 2010. That directive instructs all TSA screening agents to perform “enhanced” pat down searches that involve the actual groping of women’s breasts and the genitalia of all passengers, including children.

 

Upon learning of that directive, I conducted an interview with a trusted source working within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on 12 November, 2010. According to the information obtained during that interview, the enhanced pat down directive was not in response to any intelligence or actionable threat. Instead, it was issued as a result of the number of airline passengers “opting out” of the body scans. The reasoning was that passengers would be more likely to select the more passive and less invasive of the two options. In other words, the directive was meant to “convince” people to choose the (ostensibly) less personal and humiliating scrutiny of a full body scanner instead of being groped by a TSA agent.

 

One might wonder why one option over the other would matter so much to the Department of Homeland Security. The answer might possibly be found in DHS documents described as “conceptual discussions” about trial deployments of the full body scanners to non-aviation public locations, such as sports stadiums, schools and malls. It appears that it is the intent of DHS to eventually install naked body scanners in these venues. But first, the public must be “conditioned” to accept their use at airports."

 

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/29959

[Sitronsaft]

I lys av at du ikke har fått noen svar siden 8. juli, vil jeg informere om at denne førsteposten inneholder relativt tung og kjedelig engelsk, og at du fint kunne oppsummert hva den faktisk handler om med en eller kanskje to velformulerte setninger på norsk. That would be all.

[p0pc0rn]

What he said

[1245112654122755325882462]

Canada har en begredelig måte å utrykke seg på skriftelig.

 

Men absolutt, teorien gir jo litt mening, men agian no.

Endret 21. juli 2011 av Priim