Stage being set for "Dirty Bomb" False Flag

[Dalfararen]

STAGE BEING SET FOR “DIRTY BOMB” FALSE FLAG

 

“CHATTER” FLOWING IN FROM EVERYWHERE

 

“SUITCASE” NUKE SAID TO BE IN PLACE

 

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

 

Rumors of an upcoming terror attack to be blamed on Iran are moving around the world, “backchannel chatter.” The primary suspect is Israel who is said to have a number of small “suitcase” type nuclear weapons, some primarily “dirty bombs,” possibly supplied secretly by a previous US administration. These devices are in the “40 ton” range, highly radioactive, extremely small and can be engineered to leave the signature of a primitive device. They were originally designed for use against Soviet armor and troop concentrations in Europe if a massed attack on NATO were to occur. Current conventional systems have made this type of weapon obsolete.

 

We have been told that federal authorities have interviewed, on video, a prominent individual with specific knowledge of the possession of this type of weapon.

 

This won’t be in the news. All that “every day folks” will see is a story here or one there that don’t make sense. Why would “ultra-Liberal” Senator Chuck Schumer, nightmare “anti-gun” nut, extreme lefty and staunch New York democrat turn on the president? In fact, why are extreme liberals and conservatives all attacking President Obama and, less visibly, our military leaders, all at the same time? Who is orchestrating this oddest turn of political events in recent history? Why would the Pentagon ban Reverend Billy Graham’s son from a prayer breakfast as an “Islamophobe?”

 

Dad, the famous Reverend Billy Graham, primary spiritual advisor to every American president since Harry Truman held different views.

Rev. Billy Graham openly voiced a belief that Jews control the American media, calling it a “stranglehold” during a 1972 conversation with President Richard Nixon, according to a tape of the Oval Office meeting released Thursday by the National Archives.

“This stranglehold has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain,” the nation’s best-known preacher declared as he agreed with a stream of bigoted Nixon comments about Jews and their perceived influence in American life.

 

“You believe that?” Nixon says after the “stranglehold” comment.

 

“Yes, sir,” Graham says.

 

“Oh, boy,” replies Nixon. “So do I. I can’t ever say that but I believe it.”

 

“No, but if you get elected a second time, then we might be able to do something,” Graham replies.

 

Consider this report as a form of “innocualtion,” meant to prevent an unseemly accident.

 

EVER WONDER WHY OVER 80% OF AMERICAN’S DON’T TRUST CONGRESS?

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BahjX9nI5k&feature=player_embedded#!

 

FACE THE FACTS

 

Israel has never been in more trouble today, not from any imaginary Arab armies or a “holocaust” from Iran, a country with only minor defensive weaponry, a 4th rate military power, for those who really pay attention to these things. Israel has gotten in trouble because of “chickens coming home to roost.” Americans and Europeans have been conditioned by the press, yes, Israel controls the press in the US, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere, to ignore ethnic cleansing and war crimes in Palestine. Years of news and “infotainment” along with movies and TV series, always depicting Palestinians as crazed murders has done its job, covered mass murder in ways that Josef Goebbels could never do for Hitler.

 

Things started to go wrong for Israel when top military leaders became increasingly suspicious of 9/11. None will openly admit to it, but as years have gone on, and Iraq and Afghanistan could no longer be called real security issues for the US, an unspoken movement toward lending a suspicious eye to Israeli involvement in 9/11 has festered. Israel’s hand in propagandizing our news has become too obvious for trained observers to miss, with the direction not “pro-Israel” but looking more like a country covering for crimes.

 

This is the potential list:

 

* Possible complicity in some part of 9/11 with or without help from groups in the US and one other Middle Eastern nation known to secretly finance Israeli operations but pretending to be a “blood enemy” of the Jews

* Israeli complicity in massive financial crimes in the US, including engineering of the sub-prime mortgage collapse as an operation meant to destabilize the United States. That current financial reforms meant to prevent a repeat of this, pushed by President Obama (and military leaders) is opposed by groups financed by the Israeli lobby is a “smoking gun.”

* Terrorist attacks in Iraq, Russia, Iran and Pakistan carry clear signs of involvement of one or more intelligence agencies being involved, among them Israel.

* Israeli political machinations backed by a massive propaganda and disinformation campaign attempting to justify an unprovoked attack on Iran, disinformation including “holocaust” rhetoric and clearly falsified intelligence on Iran’s non-existent nuclear program are an almost perfect repeat of the same operation that pushed the Bush administration to mistakenly attack Iraq. Note this classic example of disinformation propaganda, conditioning “the west” to expect a dirty bomb attack: Debka/Israel Hoax and, more “cover” still from Israeli stooge Mikhail Saakashvili.

* Nuclear threats made by “extremists” in Israel against Western Europe went unheeded and the desired outcry of support for an attack on Iran never materialized. Israel would never have allowed prominent sources in its defense establishment to voice “crazy threats” to “nuke Rome” unless some purpose were served.

* Highly orchestrated attacks on the Obama administration, now finally working in close association with top military leaders, is meant to destabilize the US. Moving threats against the US, the engineering of a new market collapse by Goldman Sachs, an ineffective attack by Israel on Iran, cutting off all oil to the west or attempts by Israeli controlled media giants to forment civil unrest in the US are all “on the table” and being pushed forward.

 

HOW AMERICA’S MILITARY HAS CHANGED

 

The deteriorating situation in Iraq and Afghanistan have tied down so many resources that our defense capabilities, the contingency response that our defense planners have spent years creating and over a trillion dollars financing is a shambles. We are trucking supplies hundreds of miles through enemy territory to resupply in Afghanistan, that and flying everything thousands of miles across Russia followed by more trucking, hundreds of miles across enemy territory again. In the process, we are paying hundreds of millions of dollars a year to our own enemies, simply to keep ourselves in Twinkies and Ho Hos.

 

America is saddled with an incompetent and corrupt ally who has hopelessly embroiled us in his endless and ineffective plots, all with a massive subtext of drug dealing, selling weapons to the enemy and double dealing with foreign intelligence services.

 

How we got here is no secret and military leaders are unhappy. America got herself led into these disasters for the good of, not Israeli security but a series of intrigues, more like a chess match, playing country against country, while raking in cash selling weapons to everyone, including the US and India, but, less overtly, to Iran and the Taliban as well. These are some of the worst kept secrets in the world. Even President Obama knows, heaven forbid.

 

ONLY A NEW 9/11 CAN BAIL ISRAEL OUT

 

With massive control of news organization, half our top retired military leaders taking regularly paid “junkets” to Israel and 363 members of congress indicating an “unbreakable bond” with Israel, no matter what they are caught doing, and they have been caught so many times, starting with the 1956 Suez/Sinai invasion, the 1967 USS Liberty attack, which helped Israel sell the idea that they were attacked when quite the opposite is true, the belief is that that a new “false flag” attack can be covered easily.

 

Who could blame Israel, poor beleaguered country, the only “democracy” in the Middle East surrounded by vicious and dirty Arabs trying to sneak in and cut throats of small children in school?

 

We have already seen the stories about Iran’s planned “holocaust’ and how they are going to invade Israel, a technical impossibility” and set up gas chambers, start making soap and lamp shades out of Jews. If anything warns America that an attack is coming, hearing both “holocaust” and seeing Charles Schumer attacking a democratic president should be warning enough.

 

The rumors are that the weapons are in place in Europe and the US. “The usual suspects,” Arabs, Persians, Pakistanis, some kind of Islamic terrorist group has either been recruited, invented or is being thawed out. News stories are in place and with 9/11, film crews are ready to be onsite. Witnesses will be briefed, all to say, “yes it was an Arab dirty bomb, we saw them, Middle Eastern looking, they must have bought it from North Korea.”

 

That kind of story would hit the news within seconds from “stunned survivors” who will suddenly disappear, returning quickly to “you know where.”

 

Glenn Beck will cry.

 

LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES HAVE ALWAYS GOTTEN MARCHING ORDERS FROM TEL AVIV

 

Americans have the rare privilege of seeing the GOP, NRA, Fox News and the Tea Baggers aligned with 250 or is it 300 or 400, we aren’t sure, members of congress that have signed a letter promising to support Israel, in this case, against the interests of the United States. The names of those involved is difficult to find. A search of 100 stories on this subject has failed to give a list. Blog after blog is requesting the list of those who signed the letter but even Israeli papers don’t print it.

 

Sites claiming to list the members signing now show “FORBIDDEN” or “NO LONGER AVAILABLE.”

 

What we do know is that congress’s most liberal members, those most outspoken for gun control and all of those listed by the Tea Bag movements and GOP as the most liberal and “unpatriotic” of our politicians are now lined up with the supporters of Goldman Sachs and all, the most conservative and most liberal, are signed up against the President and the Pentagon, aligned with Israel.

 

For those with eyes to see and ears to hear, the entire “liberal” and “conservative” political hoopla of the last few years is turning out to be a subterfuge to keep Americans from uniting together to regain control of their own country, a control that, for awhile, ran our military, our intelligence services and even the oval office.

 

Now it runs only Congress, no party, just those addicted to AIPAC/Israeli funding more than allegiance to the United States of America.

 

What they may earn us through this “moral flexibility” and indifference to allegiance to their own country is another major terrorist attack. These same members of congress will receive the call, be told how to vote, what to say and exactly what they get in return, same as with Iraq.

 

Ah, the foibles of living in a democracy for sale to the highest bidder!

 

 

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/04/24/gordon-duff-stage-being-set-for-dirty-bomb-false-flag/

[del_diablo]

Så jeg leste tittelen og gadd ikke lese tråden.......... Så var det noen Amerikanere som plantet noe falskt for å erklære krig mot Iran?

[reichspöbel]

Jeg leste frem til og med tredje setning, før jeg kom over et sort hull i historien:

 

The primary suspect is Israel who is said to have a number of small “suitcase” type nuclear weapons, some primarily “dirty bombs,” possibly supplied secretly by a previous US administration. These devices are in the “40 ton” range, highly radioactive, extremely small and can be engineered to leave the signature of a primitive device.

 

Jeg er riktignok ingen ekspert på eksplosiver, men en "dirty bomb" er etter hva jeg har fortått vanlige eksplosiver kombinert med radioaktivt materiale, med hensikt å spre radioaktivitet, ikke en type atombombe. Radioaktiviteten fra slike bomber har vist seg å ikke være særlig dødelig, og bomber laget av kun vanlige eksplosiver regnes forøvrig for å være mer effektive, men det jeg reagerer mest på er at disse koffertbombene skal ha en sprengkraft på omtrent 40 tonn TNT. Det vil si at en 40 tonn dirty bomb basert på TNT nødvendigvis vil måtte veie, nettopp, 40 tonn, og så vidt jeg vet finnes det ikke konvensjonelle eksplosiver som kan senke vekten mer enn at kofferten i beste fall vil veie flere titalls tonn. Det må være litt av en koffert...

 

Jeg tror nok førsteinnlegget gjør seg best ulest, ja.

[M98kF1]

[...]Jeg tror nok førsteinnlegget gjør seg best ulest, ja.

 

Det skal jeg ikke nekte på. Men det finnes (eller fantes, hvertfall) bittesmå atombomber (ekte fisjonsbomber) i bærbar størrelse. F.eks. Davy Crockett som med sine ca. 30 kilo kunne yte en sprengkraft på ca 20 tonn TNT. Russerne hadde sikkert også sin variant. Optimalisert for koffertbæring kunne nok saken blitt enda lettere enn denne som skulle sendes ut med rakett (og dermed med styrefinner, motor, solid nok til å ramle rundt i krig og kanskje noe styringssystem også).

[Herr Brun]

[...]Jeg tror nok førsteinnlegget gjør seg best ulest, ja.

 

Det skal jeg ikke nekte på. Men det finnes (eller fantes, hvertfall) bittesmå atombomber (ekte fisjonsbomber) i bærbar størrelse.

Hele poenget er jo at "dirty bombs" ikke er atombomber. De bruker regulært sprengstoff for å spre radioaktivt materiale, det radioaktive materialet har ingen jobb enn å være radioaktivt, det fisjonerer ikke.

 

Ellers så må selvfølgelig ikke en regulær bombe med sprengkraft tilsvarende 1kg TNT, vi har andre typer regulært sprengstoff som gir mer sprengstoff per kg enn TNT.

[M98kF1]

[...]Hele poenget er jo at "dirty bombs" ikke er atombomber. De bruker regulært sprengstoff for å spre radioaktivt materiale, det radioaktive materialet har ingen jobb enn å være radioaktivt, det fisjonerer ikke.

 

[...]They were originally designed for use against Soviet armor and troop concentrations in Europe if a massed attack on NATO were to occur. Current conventional systems have made this type of weapon obsolete.[...]

Hinter ganske kraftig mot "Davy Crockett". Og hvorfor skulle USA gi "dirty bombs" til Israel? Ett land som har egne atomreaktorer, og helt sikkert den nødvendige teknologi til å kunne "gaffatape brukte brenselsstaver til dynamitt" (som er alt som kreves for å lage en "dirty bomb").

[Eaan]

Denne bomben har en yield på 250 ton, noe jeg regner med er tilsvarende 250 ton TNT. Vet ikke om det er metriske tonn eller ''short tons'', men det utgjør liten forskjell.

Man vil uansett ha en veldig potent bombe, hvorvidt den er egnet til og spre radioaktivitet er noe tvilsomt.

Siktet da til sitatet fra Rikspøbel.

Skal ikke si meg god på ''dirty bombs'' jeg eller, men de virker ikke særlige effektive.