Hvem skapte gudene?

[Thrinduil]

En som er skeptisk/ikke er religiøs vil kanskje si det at det er mennesket som har skapt gudene, slik som andre har nevnt. Men en som er religiøs av seg, vil si at guden deres alltid har eksistert.

[Abigor]

Hvorfor skal en religiøs person si at gudene alltid har eksistert dersom religionen forteller om hvordan gudene ble skapt?

[marcusss]

Hvorfor skal en religiøs person si at gudene alltid har eksistert dersom religionen forteller om hvordan gudene ble skapt?

 

Eg trur at i dei fleste religionane finst det gudar/gudommelege skapningar som alltid har eksistert, til dømes dei abrahamitiske religionane (kristendom, islam, jødedom), åsatru, hinduisme, buddisme, naturreligionane osb.

Ingen religion som eg veit om byrjar med ingenting, som plutselig vert til alt som finst (med mindre du reknar Big-Bang som ein religion ...)

[Abigor]

I opphavs tider

var det Yme bygde,

var verken sand eller sjø

eller svale bølger;

jord fantes ikke,

ikke himmelhvelv,

der var ginnunga-gap,

men gress ingen steder.

 

Mange naturreligioner inneholder historier om hvordan gudene ble skapt.

[freke]

Står det der at de prøver å finne ut hvordan masse oppstod i LHC?

It is hypothesized that the collider will produce the elusive Higgs boson, the last unobserved particle among those predicted by the Standard Model.[7][8] The verification of the existence of the Higgs boson would shed light on the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking, through which the particles of the Standard Model are thought to acquire their mass. In addition to the Higgs boson, new particles predicted by possible extensions of the Standard Model might be produced at the LHC. More generally, physicists hope that the LHC will enhance their ability to answer the following questions:[9]

 

Is the Higgs mechanism for generating elementary particle masses in the Standard Model indeed realised in nature?[10] If so, how many Higgs bosons are there, and what are their masses?

Are electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force just different manifestations of a single unified force, as predicted by various Grand Unification Theories?

Why is gravity so many orders of magnitude weaker than the other three fundamental forces? See also Hierarchy problem.

Is Supersymmetry realised in nature, implying that the known Standard Model particles have supersymmetric partners?

Are there additional sources of quark flavour violation beyond those already predicted within the Standard Model?

Why are there apparent violations of the symmetry between matter and antimatter? See also CP-violation.

What is the nature of dark matter and dark energy?

Are there extra dimensions,[11] as predicted by various models inspired by string theory, and can we detect them?

Of the possible discoveries the LHC might make, only the discovery of the Higgs particle is relatively uncontroversial, but even this is not considered a certainty. Stephen Hawking said in a BBC interview that "I think it will be much more exciting if we don't find the Higgs. That will show something is wrong, and we need to think again. I have a bet of one hundred dollars that we won't find the Higgs." In the same interview Hawking mentions the possibility of finding superpartners and adds that "whatever the LHC finds, or fails to find, the results will tell us a lot about the structure of the universe."[12][13]

Kilde: Wikipedia

 

 

 

The Higgs boson (nicknamed the God particle) is a massive scalar elementary particle predicted to exist by the Standard Model in particle physics. At present there are no known fundamental scalar particles in nature.

 

The Higgs boson is the only Standard Model particle that has not yet been observed. Experimental detection of the Higgs boson would help explain the origin of mass in the universe. More specifically, the Higgs boson would explain the difference between the massless photon, which mediates electromagnetism, and the massive W and Z bosons, which mediate the weak force. If the Higgs boson exists, it is an integral and pervasive component of the material world.

 

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in Geneva, which came online on September 10, 2008 was scheduled to become fully operational by late 2009, and was expected to provide experimental evidence confirming or refuting the Higgs boson's existence. But, an accident in September 2008 put the LHC temporarily out of commission. So the US Fermilab may be the ones to detect the Higgs boson first, though hindered due to its relatively weak particle accelerator compared to the LHC. The American team says the odds of its Tevatron accelerator detecting the famed particle first depends on its mass, being 50-50 at worst (for the smallest expected mass), and up to 96% at best (for a much larger mass).[1]

Kilde: Wikipedia

 

Så, nei. Det står ikke at de prøver å finne ut hvordan masse oppsto i LHC. Derimot prøver de med LHC å finne ut hvordan masse oppsto. Nå er det jo ikke garantert at du skjønner det jeg har klippet ut da he he.

[Red Frostraven]

Jeg skulle ønske jeg visste ALT om LHC -- eller INGENTING om LHC.