Noen med Core I7 som kan kjøre en benchmark ?

[Skjervesbu]

Vi skal kjøpe inn noen analysemaskiner som skal kjøre et program som heter OrcaFlex, det skalerer meget bra på flere kjerner, men kunne tenke meg å vurdere Core i7 965 opp mot doble Xeon-Quads. Noen derute som gidder å kjøre benchmarken fra hjemmesiden til Orchina på en Core i7 for meg og poste tilbake ?

 

http://www.orcina.com/Support/Benchmark/index.php

 

Og ja, dette er dyre maskiner, men programvarelisensen er type tigangern, så pris er underordnet.

 

Eks min Thinkpad T400:

Program Version: 2.1c

HÅVARD-THINKPAD: run at 22.02.2009 23:40:36

OS=6.0.6001 (Windows Vista Service Pack 1)

CPU=586 Level=6 Rev=1706 Physical processor cores=2

 

Processing (3 runs) using 1 thread...

0.616s of simulation took 8.377 seconds

0.616s of simulation took 8.315 seconds

0.616s of simulation took 8.362 seconds

*** Average Runtime = 8.351 seconds

 

 

Processing (3 runs) using 2 threads...

0.616s of simulation took 5.195 seconds

0.616s of simulation took 5.476 seconds

0.616s of simulation took 5.288 seconds

*** Average Runtime = 5.320 seconds

Endret 23. februar 2009 av 4HSK

[WheelMan]

Jeg har en i7 920, hjelper det?

[Skagen]

Tråden var feilpostet og har blitt flyttet til riktig kategori.

 

(Vennligst ikke kommenter dette innlegget. Reaksjoner på moderering gjøres pr. PM/melding)

[mentat1978]

Program Version: 2.1c
PC2:  run at 10.03.2009 19:21:55
OS=5.2.3790 (Windows XP x64 Service Pack 2)
CPU=586 Level=6 Rev=1A04 Logical processors=8 Physical processor cores=4

Processing (3 runs) using 1 thread...
   0,616s of simulation took	4,281 seconds
   0,616s of simulation took	4,296 seconds
   0,616s of simulation took	4,297 seconds
   *** Average Runtime =	 4,291 seconds


Processing (3 runs) using 2 threads...
   0,616s of simulation took	3,297 seconds
   0,616s of simulation took	3,297 seconds
   0,616s of simulation took	3,297 seconds
   *** Average Runtime =	 3,297 seconds


Processing (3 runs) using 3 threads...
   0,616s of simulation took	2,172 seconds
   0,616s of simulation took	2,187 seconds
   0,616s of simulation took	2,172 seconds
   *** Average Runtime =	 2,177 seconds


Processing (3 runs) using 4 threads...
   0,616s of simulation took	1,906 seconds
   0,616s of simulation took	1,906 seconds
   0,616s of simulation took	1,906 seconds
   *** Average Runtime =	 1,906 seconds

 

CPU er en Intel Core i7 920, og er svært fornøyd med den. Hva slags program er dette egentlig?

[WheelMan]

Den brukte bare 4 av 8 tråder i testen du kjørte, mentat. Står HT på?

[cazber]

Program Version: 2.1c

WT: run at 12.03.2009 22:22:51

OS=6.1.7000 (Windows NT New x64)

CPU=586 Level=6 Rev=1A04 Logical processors=8 Physical processor cores=4

 

Processing (3 runs) using 1 thread...

0,616s of simulation took 4,290 seconds

0,616s of simulation took 4,275 seconds

0,616s of simulation took 4,258 seconds

*** Average Runtime = 4,274 seconds

 

 

Processing (3 runs) using 2 threads...

0,616s of simulation took 2,434 seconds

0,616s of simulation took 2,433 seconds

0,616s of simulation took 2,496 seconds

*** Average Runtime = 2,454 seconds

 

 

Processing (3 runs) using 3 threads...

0,616s of simulation took 1,888 seconds

0,616s of simulation took 1,825 seconds

0,616s of simulation took 1,841 seconds

*** Average Runtime = 1,851 seconds

 

 

Processing (3 runs) using 4 threads...

0,616s of simulation took 1,482 seconds

0,616s of simulation took 1,528 seconds

0,616s of simulation took 1,498 seconds

*** Average Runtime = 1,503 seconds

 

Kjører Core i7 920 med Window 7 64 bit. HT er på, og ingen overklokking.