jallajall

Skulle? Skulle ifølge hvem, hva, hvilken standard? Dersom den siktede ikke hadde benyttet seg av rettsapparatet og anket en beslutning hvorpå saken settes på pause i påvente av videre saksgang i høyere instanser? Litt av en standard du har. Godt å se jeg ikke er den eneste som gjør seg dummere med vilje. Irrelevant. Dette er en helt annen sak.

Judge agrees to unseal additional filings from Jan. 6 case as Trump signals challenge U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Thursday agreed to unseal additional filings from special counsel Jack Smith laying out his election interference case against former President Trump, something Trump’s attorneys signaled they plan to challenge. Hvorfor dette hastverket for Smith med å få dommeren til å offentliggjøre alt dette når en dato for en evt. rettsak i 2025 ikke en gang er bestemt? "Hm".

Scoop: Some top Dems won't commit to certifying a Trump win TREASON!!

Trump ønsket å bruke nasjonalgarden eller whatever, for å sørge for at eventet var sikkert, men ble motarbeidet på dette.

#StudentsForTrump

Republikanerne haler innpå demokratene i flere viktigte stater. For eksempel Pennsylvania: Mail ballot requests sammenlignet med 2020: 🔵 Democrats: 60.6% (-4.8) 🔴 Republican: 27.8% (+3.7) Voter registration:

Vært en svært dårlig uke for Harris pollingmessig, selv i California flykter blacks & hispanics fra henne. Samme dato 2016, 2020 og 2024. Nasjonalt 🔵 2016 Clinton: +5.8 🔵 2020 Biden: +10 🔵 2024 Harris: +1.8 Arizona 🔴 2016 Trump: +0.7 🔵 2020 Biden: +2.7 🔴 2024 Trump: +0.9 Nevada 🔵 2016 Clinton: +1.3 🔵 2020 Biden: +6.0 🔵 2024 Harris: +1.0 Wisconsin 🔵 2016 Clinton: +6.8 🔵 2020 Biden: +5.5 🔵 2024 Harris: +0.4 Michigan 🔵 2016 Clinton: +7.3 🔵 2020 Biden: +6.7 🔴 2024 Trump: +0.8 Pennsylvania 🔵 2016 Clinton: +9.4 🔵 2020 Biden: +7.1 🔴 2024 Trump: +0.3 North Carolina 🔵 2016 Clinton: +2.6 🔵 2020 Biden: +1.9 🔴 2024 Trump: +0.6 Georgia 🔴 2016 Trump: +4.7 🔴 2020 Trump: +0.4 🔴 2024 Trump: +0.8

Kamala Harris is unable to answer basic questions on ‘60 Minutes’ An easy interview and a hard one: An unprepared Harris botched them both The Vibes Have Run Out For Kamala Harris True, true and true.

Premiere i morgen! January 6: The Most Deadliest Day.

Overtagelse av makten fra hvem? Seg selv..?

Hillary Clinton warns that allowing free speech on social media means ‘we lose control’

How Donald Trump Jr. Became the Crown Prince of MAGA World “I expended about 1,000% of my political capital” convincing his father to select JD Vance, he said with a grin as Vance smiled bashfully beside him. Trump Jr.’s primary focus is what happens afterward. He is working to make sure the next Trump administration and GOP Congress are stocked with more JD Vances—and to keep out those who might hinder an aggressive second-term agenda. “What I want to do is work on the transition, and it’s not about placing people,” he said. “It’s about blocking the people who would be a disaster in that administration. I will cut out so many people, people’s heads are going to spin.” Vance refers to their project as “keeping the snakes out of the administration,” and said they have “probably discussed or floated thousands of names at this point,” from Treasury secretary and secretary of state on down to low-level appointees. “My role will be to make sure that those bad actors are not getting into the administration to subvert my father and his policies,” Trump Jr. said. “Now we know who those people are. In ’16, we had no idea.” Trump’s first administration was frequently reined in by appointees desperate to stop him from doing things they believed were unwise, dangerous or illegal. Aides snatched executive orders off his desk to prevent him from signing them, cabinet members slow-walked his plans, military generals pretended to follow his orders while ignoring them and senior officials refused to draw up proposals he requested. Some traditional Republicans have heartburn about the direction in which Trump Jr. is pushing the party, which is often not aligned with the conservative principles of the pre-Trump era. But Trump Jr.’s allies consider him a vital voice in his father’s ear. “I think Trump has learned that Don has a gut-level understanding of his voters, and he’s been very persistent in representing their views,” said Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host, who joined Trump Jr. in lobbying for Vance and was “amazed and delighted” by the selection. Carlson and Trump Jr. are occasional hunting and fishing companions; among Trump Jr.’s many ventures is a high-end, largely nonpolitical sportsmen’s lifestyle magazine called Field Ethos. “To this day a lot of Republican strategists can’t understand the actual voters that make up the party. Don understands them instinctively.”

Hva er alternativet?

Det er jo ikke bare slik andre fremstiller henne, men også andre demokrater, inkl guvernører som Newsom og Polis som sier det rett ut, men også hun selv når hun snakker om en "new way forward", hvordan hun er fokusert på fremtid i stedet for fortid, og alt slik. Både hun og demokratene prøver å fremstille henne som noe annet enn "more of the same" - more of the same ville jo vært bra dersom det hadde vært en vinneroppskrift, noe det ikke er.

Jobbtallene ble nylig nedjustert med nesten 900.000 fra mars 2023 til mars 2024, forteller de ikke slike ting til Biden?

Jo det har hun jo (media har jo skrevet masse om det, første google treff eksempel eksempel eksempel eksempel eksempel eksempel), og det må hun jo også gjøre. Det er jo derfor Trump-kampanjen hamrer løs på at hun bare er mer av det samme vi har sett de fire siste årene. Mer-av-det-samme er jo gjerne det en sittende president går for når han skal stille til gjenvalg, men det er ingen vinneroppskrift i 2024. Det ville vært mye mer strategist lurt av Biden og Harris og sagt de har hatt uenigheter, men at Harris har valgt å støtte han, i stedet for å tegne et bilde av de hele tiden er samstemte og går hånd i hånd inn i solnedgangen hver gang..

Donald Trump Gets Polling Boost Among Women Likely To Decide Election Donald Trump is seeing an increase in support among white women voters who do not have a college degree, a key demographic expected to play a decisive role in the upcoming election. According a PBS News/NPR/Marist poll, conducted between September 27 and October 1, Trump holds a 1-point lead among non-college educated white women, with 55 percent of the vote to Vice President Kamala Harris' 42 percent. Og hos CNN's poll for Micigan er han til og med likt med Harris på unge velger 18-29 år (45-45), en gruppe Biden vant med 24 poeng. ..men verken PBS/Marist eller CNN/SSRS er blant de mest treffsikre, men kanskje pollingen er bedre i år enn den har vært tidligere?

Helene hit Trump strongholds in Georgia and North Carolina. It could swing the election. Hurricane Helene hit especially hard in heavily Republican areas of Georgia and North Carolina — a fact that could work to Donald Trump’s disadvantage in the two swing states. Joa..

Ja hva er egentlig rollen til en VP..ifølge grunnloven? Harris = Biden. Vanskelig å brande seg som en change kandidat da.

Etter 1353 dager tar Biden endelig for første gang turen innom presserommet i det kvite hus. Biden om Kamala: “We’re singing from the same song sheet. She helped pass all the laws. She was a major player in everything we’ve done.”

Forøvrig litt mer om Fawzia for en mnd siden: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-817572

Sure. Saken havnet offisielt hos Chutkan igjen 2. august. 10 uker før valget, 27. august, sender Smith inn en ny siktelse som erstatter den gamle. Samme tiltaler, basert på mindre bevis. Shrinkflation. 5. september får han tillatelse til å sende inn briefen sin før Team Trump, og han bruker imponerende kun 3 uker på dette. Vi er godt innenfor 60-90 dager helt siden saken havnet tilbake på pulten til Chutkan. Men hvorfor så hastverk for Smith, når det åpenbart vil påvirke valget?

Bolton vs Ramaswamy: US Foreign Policy. Old right vs New right. Neocon vs America First.

Kan det tenkes å påvirke valget å gå mot føderale regler han selv er underlagt for å pushet ut dette nå? Hvorfor var det viktig å få sendt inn nå, det er jo ikke relevant eller avgjørende for saken? The way motions work – under the federal rules, and consistent with common sense – is that the prosecutor files an indictment; the defense makes motions (to dismiss charges, to suppress evidence, or what have you); and then the prosecution responds to those motions. Makes sense, right? It’s worked for hundreds of years in our courts. Not here. Not when there’s an election right around the corner and dwindling opportunity to make a dent. So Smith turned the well-established, thoroughly uncontroversial rules of criminal procedure on their head and asked Judge Chutkan for permission to file first – even with no actual defense motion pending. Trump’s team objected, and the judge acknowledged that Smith’s request to file first was “procedurally irregular” – moments before she ruled in Smith’s favor, as she’s done at virtually every consequential turn. Which brings us to the second point: Smith’s proactive filing is prejudicial to Trump, legally and politically. It’s ironic. Smith has complained throughout the case that Trump’s words might taint the jury pool. Yet Smith now uses grand jury testimony (which ordinarily remains secret at this stage) and drafts up a tidy 165-page document that contains all manner of damaging statements about a criminal defendant, made outside of a trial setting and without being subjected to the rules of evidence or cross-examination, and files it publicly, generating national headlines. You know who’ll see those allegations? The voters, sure – and also members of the jury pool.

Finnes nok av legal expert som mener det motsatte. Kommer helt an på hvem man spør. For eksempel, hvis Jack Smith bestemmer seg for å holde pressekonferanser hver dag frem til valget, så er ikke dette en handling som kan tenkes å påvirke valget?