jallajall

Wara har jeg en forståelse for havnet høyt oppe, men Velle..tja...

Smooth.

Tensions rise between Harris and Biden teams as election nears Some on the Harris team say that top White House aides aren't sufficiently coordinating Biden's messaging and schedule to align with what's best for the vice president's campaign. Tja, det kan jo faktisk være tilfeldig at Biden to ganger den siste uka har valgt å snakke med pressen akkurat samtidig som Harris er på andre kanaler....

Where Harris and Trump Stand on Ukraine Sam Kessler, a geopolitical analyst with the risk advisory firm North Star Support Group, told The Epoch Times that the widely divergent stances on Ukraine stemmed from “two different foreign policy philosophies.” On the one hand, he said, there was the Cold War mindset of Biden and Harris that sought to degrade Russia through proxy war in Ukraine. On the other hand, there was Trump’s realpolitik approach, which sought to deal with U.S. capabilities as they actually were and to reorient towards the struggle with China. Those two philosophies, Kessler said, result in much different strategies...

Bidens helsesjekk og medical records viste jo at han var i tipp-topp form, så er vel uansett ikke så mye man får ut av det..

"Martha, do you hear yourself?"

Harris weighing where to put more distance between her and Biden Trump has been criticizing her for an answer to a question in which she initially declined to say anything she would have done different the past four years. Vice President Kamala Harris’ team has been discussing ways to clean up her responses to questions this week about how she would differentiate herself from President Joe Biden, according to four people familiar with the discussions. Walz: Voters Do ‘Not Need To Be Concerned With’ Difference Between Biden, Harris “The difference between Kamala Harris and Joe Biden is not what [voters] need to be concerned with,” Walz said.

Enda en brutal poll for Harris. Ipsos skal normalt ligge langt mer til venstre enn dette. Både NBC/Hart og CBS/YouGov kommer med poll i løpet av dagen/morgendagen. Tipper Harris +5 på begge for å holde motet oppe.

Apropos TYT. Ana Kasparian anser seg nå som independent. After Trump came onto the political scene, and especially after he was elected in 2016, the us-vs-them mentality immediately took shape. Anyone who refused to “resist Trump” was seen as a threat to the country, and I was fully on board with that mindset. It all felt righteous at first. But eventually, the tactics deployed to fight Trump became repetitive, boring and ultimately fruitless. Polling shows that he has increased his support among Black and Latino voters despite wall-to-wall coverage on his unsavory, racist or bigoted remarks. I can’t help but acknowledge that the only thing that was accomplished by resisting Trump was less understanding and more division among Americans. I personally became reluctant to challenge my “side” or engage with voters who disagreed with me. In turn, I became less knowledgeable about the people and world around me. I saw Republican voters as an evil monolith and that was a big mistake. My evolution started in 2022 when I was sexually assaulted by a homeless man in my neighborhood as I was walking my dog. That horrible experience alone didn’t change me politically, but the treatment I received from the far left and some progressives after sharing the story did. I was told that by publicly sharing what had happened to me, I was stigmatizing my “unhoused neighbors.” Others accused me of feeding into racist tropes because they assumed that my attacker was black. But I had never even disclosed the man’s race. (he was white) Then there was the insane reaction to one of my tweets in March 2023: I'm a woman. Please don't ever refer to me as a person with a uterus, birthing person, or person who menstruates. How do people not realize how degrading this is? You can support the transgender community without doing this shit. All hell broke loose after I posted those words. En ganske interessant podcast hvor hun forteller mer rundt sine forskjellige synspunkter på venstre- og høyresiden. (får et godt inntrykk av hva det handler om ved å se de første 15-20 minuttene)

The Scent of a Harris Panic in the Air Why are Democratic pundits—from Axelrod to Carville—blasting the Harris campaign and otherwise warning of bad things to come? Why are some of the once Democrat sure-thing senate races—e.g., in Ohio, Wisconsin, and even Michigan—tightening up? Pundit poll-watchers are suggesting that Trump is close, even, or slightly ahead in the swing-state polls, suggesting that he is nearing a margin that could cancel out anticipated “ballot irregularities”. The expected October Harris-Biden surprises—the opportune Fed interest rate cut, the transparently desperate Jack Smith beefed-up re-indictment, the current new Hollywood Trump-hit movie, the desperate Zelensky fly-in to Pennsylvania, the election-cycle customary Bob Woodward unsourced gossip book—seemed so far to have had no effect. Why would any campaign send out the bumbling Tim Walz to a Fox Sunday interview after his disastrous debate? Why is a suddenly smiling Biden so eager to claim candidate and VP Harris as a co-conspirator to his disastrous four years? Why would Harris pivot and now agree to (admittedly mostly softball) interviews, thus confirming to the voting public why she wisely had previously avoided all press conferences, interviews, and town halls? Why—after the last two moderator-rigged ABC and CBS debates—would Harris desperately want another and possibly believe that Trump would ever agree to any such warped forum? The last 4-5 Harris scripted interviews, but especially on CBS’s 60 Minutes, have been train wrecks. Everyone expected (and was not disappointed) the on-spec word salads, predictable sappy retreats to her misleading bio, the now accustomed deer-in-the-headlights confusion about her prior three years with Biden, and the general mush in lieu of any policy prescriptions. Why would CBS think it worth ruining its already debased reputation by doctoring the transcript of the Harris disastrous interview in a vain attempt at Orwellian repair? Why is a rusty but still narcissistic Barack Obama at last hitting the campaign trail? And is he still effective—or reduced to becoming an Oprah-like caricature? After all, is it wise for the elite Obama (in his now accustomed snarky “clingers” style) to venture out of his mansions (Kalorama? the Hawaii beachfront? or the Martha Vineyard estate?) to talk down to black males struggling under years of a hyperinflationary economy, a flood of illegal immigrants from an open border, and a four-year-spiking crime rate? Does the Netflix grandee berating black men as victims of false consciousness, misled, and brainwashed into voting for the Trump agenda really win them over to Harris? Does the hundred-million-dollar-plus man Obama persuade anyone by reverting for a few moments to his old community-organizing, fake black patois and his pseudo-racial intimacy of “brothers”? And does it work for Obama (remember “when they go low, we go high”) to blast Trump as racist and crude, when Obama jokes that Trump wears diapers— this after previously suggesting at the Democratic convention that Trump suffered from small genitalia? If this should continue, soon the July 21st coup that removed Biden, along with the Harris pick of Tim Walz, will go down as days of Democrat infamy. Så forøvrig Newt Gingrich spekulere litt her om dagen på at Biden kanskje vil Harris skal tape.. "wouldn’t it be a great legacy if Joe’s the only guy ever to beat Trump?" True.

The 4 reasons Harris is losing I have spoken with three Democratic operatives behind the scenes who all believe the race is slipping away from Vice President Kamala Harris. They offer four major reasons why this is happening. The first is Harris herself. She is simply not a very good candidate. She lacks confidence and is seemingly terrified to take any unrehearsed or unvetted policy questions. This liability is not a surprise to those who follow politics closely, but is a new concern for a number of voters. The second reason Harris is slipping is the Biden-Harris administration’s record. It is weighing her down, dragging her down. Harris made this problem significantly worse while doing an interview this week on ABC’s “The View.” Even though the purpose of this puff interview was to make her look good, Harris fumbled the hand-off. Harris-supporting host Sunny Hostin asked: “Would you have done anything differently than President Biden during the past four years?” Harris immediately veered off the rails: “There is not a thing that comes to mind,” Harris responded. “Not a thing.” Third, we come to the same issue that ultimately ended the presidential campaign of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis: It’s virtually impossible to run against a “cult of personality,” which is what Trump has going for him. Finally, we have the issue that the Democratic operatives I spoke with believe is the most devastating for Harris: the old “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” question. The problem for Harris is that potentially millions of Americans within the Democrats’ core constituencies not only believe they were better off four years ago, but think that they and their families are being crushed now by the Biden-Harris policies and failures.

Jeg fordømmer fake elctors plot.

Hvorfor ikke?

Det er av en viss relevanse om det er kupp eller annet. Og om det ikke er så farlig hva det heter, er det vel heller ikke noe i veien for å gå vekk fra denne "kupp"-betegnelsen og heller kalle det noe som faktisk gjenspeiler virkeligheten og det som faktisk skjedde..

Democrats Fear Jill Stein Will Spoil Everything Again Ja det er jo en grunn til at "the defenders of democracy" har gjort alt i sin makt for å prøve å hindre alle uromomenter (RFK, West, etc) å stille til valg.

Scott Presler. Han har til og med flyttet til PA for å sikre Trump én ekstra stemme. That said, dersom Trump vinner PA er det mye takket være han, ingen har gjort mer de siste årene enn han.

Spørs nok om "kupp" er den rette betegnelsen å bruke her.

Early voting is down significantly compared to 2020 — and the data hold bad news for Democrats The dramatic rise in early voting has led many to think the election might be effectively over days or weeks before Election Day. The data thus far show that won’t be true — and the numbers aren’t comforting for Democrats. En generell nedgang for dems og en generell oppgang for republicans. Samme trend for mail ballot requests, og registrering av nye velgere. For eksempel for første gang i historien har republikanerne flere aktive velgere i North Carolina enn demokratene.

Oh. NYT/Siena, Pensylvania Harris +4. I deres nasjonale poll tidligere i uka hadde de Harris +3. Og de mener at Pennsylvania både kommer til å stemme til venstre for popular vote og til venstre for en popular vote +3.

De lovlige makthaverne var Trump. Biden var bare en vanlig borger, ikke noe makt som kunne overtas der i gården. Biden kom ikke til makten før et par uker senere.

Obama Scolds Black Men As Dems Fret Over Harris Former President Barack Obama on Thursday admonished Black men who are hesitating to back Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign, telling them it’s “not acceptable” to sit out this election and suggesting they might be reluctant to vote for Harris because she’s a woman.

Empress Kamala’s New Clothes Like Biden in June and July, she isn’t doing well when exposed to the public. This week’s political headlines were... - “Democrats start to hit the panic button.” - “Kamala Harris Is Making the Same Mistakes She Made in 2019.” - “Democrats grow anxious.” - Ms. Harris “struggling to break through with working class” and “struggles to differentiate herself from Biden” and “struggles to answer questions” and generally . . . struggles. - “Kamala Harris Could Be in Trouble.” Her problem—like Mr. Biden’s—comes from finally being seen. Most revealing was her “60 Minutes” interview with CBS’s Bill Whitaker, who provided a rare glimpse of real journalism by asking tough questions and pushing back against her carefully empty, focus-grouped replies. When he asked how she’d pay for her raft of new entitlements, she professed her love for small businesses. Obviously. Asked again how she’d “pay,” she rolled out the “fair share” taxes line. Asked how she’d convince Congress to get on board, she suggested unnamed congressional Republicans secretly support her tax hikes. Asked to explain why her administration allowed a “historic flood” of migrants to cross the border, she dodged—four times. Invited to enlighten the many voters who “still say they don’t know you,” Ms. Harris agreed she definitely needed to “earn” their votes—and didn’t say how. Deja vu 2020. Jo mer man hører fra henne, jo dårligere går det.

Skulle? Skulle ifølge hvem, hva, hvilken standard? Dersom den siktede ikke hadde benyttet seg av rettsapparatet og anket en beslutning hvorpå saken settes på pause i påvente av videre saksgang i høyere instanser? Litt av en standard du har. Godt å se jeg ikke er den eneste som gjør seg dummere med vilje. Irrelevant. Dette er en helt annen sak.

Judge agrees to unseal additional filings from Jan. 6 case as Trump signals challenge U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Thursday agreed to unseal additional filings from special counsel Jack Smith laying out his election interference case against former President Trump, something Trump’s attorneys signaled they plan to challenge. Hvorfor dette hastverket for Smith med å få dommeren til å offentliggjøre alt dette når en dato for en evt. rettsak i 2025 ikke en gang er bestemt? "Hm".