Gå til innhold

bojangles

Medlemmer
  • Innlegg

    6 881
  • Ble med

  • Dager vunnet

    19

Innlegg skrevet av bojangles

  1.  

    AI sammendrag:

    Spoiler

    1. Kursk Offensive

    • Ukrainian Counteroffensive: Ukraine has launched a new offensive operation in the Kursk region, which is proceeding successfully. Ukrainian forces are using artillery, tanks, and aviation bombs to push back Russian forces.
    • Russian Counteroffensive: Russia is attempting its own counteroffensive, capturing a few villages but failing to achieve significant tactical success. Ukrainian forces have inflicted considerable damage on Russian convoys, halting Russian advances.
    • Russian Dilemma: The video discusses a critical dilemma for Russian forces, as they face the possibility of either continuing their offensive or withdrawing from the region.

    2. Velika Village Operations

    • Ukrainian Advances: Ukrainian forces have gained ground in the Velika region, using aviation bombs to strike key Russian positions, including a major Russian base that was completely destroyed by a Ukrainian bomb.

    3. Surrender of Ahmad Battalion Soldiers

    • Voluntary Surrender: Some members of the Russian Ahmad Battalion voluntarily surrendered to Ukrainian forces. The commander of the Ahmad Battalion stated that these soldiers "no longer exist" for him and that they would not be exchanged in any prisoner swaps.

    4. Kursk Nuclear Plant

    • Ukrainian Drone Activity: Ukrainian drones captured images of cooling towers near the Kursk nuclear power plant, indicating the proximity of Ukrainian forces to this strategic location. The objectives of this operation remain undisclosed by the Ukrainian command.

    5. Assassination Attempt on Donald Trump

    • Details of the Attempt: The video reports on an assassination attempt on former US President Donald Trump during a golf game. The suspect, Ryan Roth, was armed and had pro-Ukrainian views, which negatively impacts Ukraine's image in American politics.
    • Political Rhetoric: The video discusses the dangers of extreme political rhetoric and its potential to incite violence, stressing the need for neutrality when discussing politics, particularly in the context of US support for Ukraine.

    6. Russian Advances in Eastern Ukraine

    • Prokhorivka and Vuhledar: The situation in Prokhorivka and Vuhledar is tense, with Russia making small but steady advances, particularly around Vuhledar, a key logistics hub for Ukraine. Russian forces are pushing to secure the railway for winter logistics.

    • Kharkiv Region: Russian forces are advancing in the northern Kharkiv region, closing in on the Oskil River and posing a threat to Ukrainian forces in the area by potentially cutting off supply routes.

    7. International Military Support

    • US and European Aid: The video mentions upcoming military aid from the US, including new modifications of Bradley fighting vehicles. Italy has also committed to sending additional air defense systems to Ukraine, while a deal with the Netherlands for Patriot systems has stalled.

    In summary, the video provides updates on the evolving military situation in Ukraine, particularly in the Kursk region, as well as insights into the broader geopolitical implications of US and European military aid to Ukraine. Additionally, the report touches on the sensitive issue of political rhetoric and its potential consequences in the US

     

    • Liker 1
    • Innsiktsfullt 1
  2.  

     

    AI sammendrag:

    Spoiler

    1. Ukrainian Offensive in Kursk Region

    • Initial Attack: The Ukrainian forces launched a powerful offensive across the border towards Glushkovo. The Russians, recognizing the imminent threat, tried to establish logistical lines using pontoon bridges and the Korenevo-Glushkovo highway.
    • Ukrainian Anticipation: Ukraine anticipated these moves and targeted Russian reinforcements using ATACMS cluster warheads, effectively neutralizing Russian efforts.

    2. Russian Struggles and Isolation

    • Russian Logistical Issues: Around 3,000 Russian soldiers in the Glushkovo area have struggled to maintain logistical support, as crucial roads, including the Glushkovo-Korenevo highway, are under Ukrainian fire control. This has isolated the Russian forces, leaving only bridges across the Seym River as the remaining supply routes.

    • Pontoon Bridges Destroyed: Combat footage shows Ukrainian forces using HIMARS to destroy Russian pontoon bridges and construction equipment. Ukrainian drone operators also destroyed Russian equipment attempting to repair these bridges.

    3. Russian Counterattacks

    • Russian Counteroffensive: The Russians launched several counterattacks, attempting to retake the Korenevo-Glushkovo highway to reconnect their forces. Redeployed troops from eastern Ukraine entered Snagost and launched assaults on Ukrainian positions in various villages.
    • Ukrainian Defense: Ukraine was prepared for the counterattack, using FPV drone units to target Russian assault units along the highway. These drones continuously disrupted Russian reinforcements, striking troops every five minutes.

    4. Ukrainian Tactical Success

    • Preparation for the Next Offensive: Ukrainian forces assembled a formidable assault group, including tanks and engineering vehicles, to clear Russian fortifications at the border. The assault group advanced across open fields, knowing that the Russians had not had time to lay landmines, and moved towards the town of Veseloye, which they are now storming.
    • Breakthrough: The weak Russian response allowed Ukrainian forces to break through by at least three kilometers, leaving only seven kilometers to reach Glushkovo.

    5. Russian Desperation

    • Night Reinforcements: In a desperate attempt to reinforce their defenses, Russian troops tried to use the Seym River bridges to deploy soldiers under cover of night. However, Ukrainian drone operators detected the movement and called in a HIMARS strike, inflicting heavy casualties.

    6. Strategic Implications

    • Russian Vulnerabilities: The Ukrainian offensive has outflanked Russian forces that had penetrated into Ukrainian-held territory, putting them at risk of encirclement. This development undermines the Russian efforts to reestablish logistical lines to Glushkovo and exposes weaknesses in their operational planning.

    • Tactical Shift: The success of the Ukrainian strategy highlights a shift in the tactical balance in favor of Ukraine, potentially leading to a major setback for Russian forces and altering the broader dynamics of the conflict.

    7. Support for Ukraine

    • The video concludes by promoting an online store, UA Supporter, where viewers can purchase products with Ukrainian symbols to show support for both the channel and Ukraine.

    In summary, the Ukrainian forces have successfully launched a significant offensive in the Kursk region, disrupting Russian supply lines and counterattacks, leading to a potential breakthrough that could have larger strategic implications in the conflict.

     

    • Liker 2
    • Hjerte 2
  3.  

     

    AI sammendrag:

    Spoiler

    1. Frontline Update in Kursk Oblast

    • Ukrainian Response to Russian Counteroffensive: The video discusses a Ukrainian column of armored vehicles crossing the Russian border into a new location in the Kursk Oblast, attempting to split the Russian counteroffensive. Ukrainian President Zelensky confirmed that Ukraine was expecting the Russian counterattack.

    • Russian Counteroffensive: The village of Korono has been the focus of Ukraine's operations for the past five weeks. However, Russia was able to resupply and reinforce the area, launching a counteroffensive south from Korono and east from the Glushkovo district. Ukraine was prepared and launched its own counterattack to cut off Russian forces.

    • Troop Numbers and Attrition Warfare: Russia has significantly increased its troop presence in the region, growing from 10,000 to 45,000. The Ukrainian strategy remains focused on attrition, making Russia expend resources and sustain heavy casualties in efforts to retake its own territory. Russia's approach of bombarding its own cities and settlements to deny Ukraine control of occupied areas is noted.

    2. Prisoner Exchanges and Human Impact

    • A light-hearted moment occurs when Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) are told that Ukraine has invaded Russia, resulting in surprised reactions after being held captive for over a year.
    • Prisoner Exchanges: Videos show the return of Ukrainian and Russian POWs. The Ukrainians are joyful and emotional, having been in captivity for more than two years, while the young Russian conscripts appear less enthusiastic.

    3. Russian and Ukrainian Military Positions

    • Donetsk Region: Russian offensives in Donetsk have slowed, with Ukraine's incursions in the Kursk Oblast reportedly disrupting Russian advances. Ukraine continues to fall back from specific areas under pressure but remains resilient in key locations like the small village of Vuhledar.
    • Russian Casualties and Failed Assaults: The video highlights how Russia continues to push forward despite suffering massive casualties and losing significant resources.

    4. US-Ukraine Long-Range Strike Discussions

    • Debate over Long-Range Strikes: Ukrainian allies are pressuring the US to allow Ukraine to use long-range missiles like ATACMS for strikes deeper into Russian territory. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan is resisting this move. The UK Prime Minister and US President Biden discussed the issue, and while Biden hasn’t given the green light, discussions continue.

    • Putin’s Reaction: Putin warned that allowing Ukraine to strike Russian territory with Western weapons would mean direct NATO involvement in the war. His speech suggests he is not overly concerned about current Ukrainian drone strikes but would treat precision missile attacks as a different escalation.

    • Ukraine’s Desire for Long-Range Missiles: President Zelensky emphasized that Ukraine needs these weapons for survival. The Biden administration is still maintaining its restrictions, though there are theories that these restrictions might be lifted discreetly if Ukraine begins striking Russia.

    5. Geopolitical and Election Implications

    • US Elections and Russian Strategy: The video speculates that Putin is unlikely to escalate to nuclear weapons before the US elections, as he is hopeful for a Trump victory. Trump and his allies have signaled they would end US support for Ukraine and potentially allow Russia to keep the territory it has seized. The video argues that Russia may instead provoke the US by attacking military bases in the Middle East to hurt Vice President Kamala Harris’s chances in the upcoming election.

    • Republican Campaigns and Political Exploitation: The video also addresses how Trump and Republican leaders are politicizing the deaths of US service members for electoral gain, comparing it to potential future Russian provocations.

    6. Kremlin TV and Nuclear Threats

    • On Russian state TV, Kremlin-aligned commentators discuss Ukraine's invasion of Russian territory, but responses vary, with some maintaining that the war is going according to plan. There are also references to potential nuclear strikes, although these threats are framed as part of Russia's broader military strategy rather than imminent action.

    7. International Reactions and Aid

    • Foreign Aid: Spain, Finland, and Latvia continue to provide military aid to Ukraine. Spain notably vetoed a Hungarian bid to purchase a train group due to concerns over Hungary’s pro-Russian stance.
    • India’s Role: India secured the release of 45 Indian nationals who had been tricked into joining the Russian military, signaling the growing complexity of international diplomatic relations in the conflict.

    8. Economic Impact on Russia

    • Russian Economy in Crisis: Russia’s Central Bank raised the key interest rate to 19% due to inflation, with the ruble devaluing rapidly. Restaurants in Russia are adding surcharges due to the economic instability, highlighting the deepening crisis within Russia.

    9. Ukrainian Resilience and Production

    • Artillery Production: Ukraine has begun producing its own 155mm NATO-standard artillery shells, further improving its military self-sufficiency.
    • IMF Support: The International Monetary Fund approved a $1.1 billion tranche for Ukraine, with conditions for further economic reforms.

    10. Conclusion and Future Outlook

    • The video ends with an optimistic message about Ukraine’s resilience and the continuing support from international partners. The focus is on the long-term nature of the conflict, with the expectation that the war could continue for years, especially as Ukraine adapts to its new circumstances.

    In summary, the video provides a thorough update on the latest military developments in Ukraine, geopolitical dynamics, and the impact of Western aid and sanctions on the conflict.

     

    • Liker 2
  4.  

     

    AI sammendrag:

    Spoiler

    1. Financial Support for Ukraine

    • US Financial Aid: The discussion begins by noting the approval of $61 billion in military aid from the US to Ukraine, which has been critical in providing munitions and long-range weaponry. However, despite this assistance, Ukraine's financial needs are far larger. The war is costing approximately $100 billion annually, and the approved aid does not cover this expense.

    • Seizing Russian Assets: There was an initiative from the G7 to leverage frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine, involving a $50 billion program that would securitize long-term interest from those assets. However, this effort has stalled. The conversation speculates that optimism surrounding a potential victory of the Biden-Harris administration in the next US presidential election might have slowed this process. There is concern about the potential repercussions of a Trump win in the 2024 election, as he has expressed intentions to cut support to Ukraine. This would leave a significant gap in the $100 billion annual funding Ukraine needs to sustain the war.

    • Private Creditors and Debt Restructuring: One positive development is an agreement between Ukraine and private creditors to restructure $23 billion of Ukraine's debt. This restructuring includes a write-off, an extension of maturity, and a reduction in interest payments, saving Ukraine $12 billion. However, compared to the scale of Ukraine's annual financial needs, this contribution is minimal and does not significantly alter the overall financial outlook.

    • Long-term Strategy: The speakers express frustration that Western financial aid to Ukraine has been reactive and piecemeal. They argue that G7 countries need to create a long-term funding strategy to ensure Ukraine has the financial resources to defend itself and ultimately win the war. The current approach is described as inadequate, with Western nations often hesitating or delaying necessary financial support.

    2. Sanctions on Russia

    • Effectiveness of Sanctions: The conversation explores the effectiveness of sanctions on Russia and their impact on Russian oligarchs. Oleg Deripaska, a prominent Russian oligarch, recently criticized Putin during a visit to Japan, indicating possible dissatisfaction among Russia’s wealthy elite. However, there’s uncertainty about whether such criticisms are widespread.

    • Secondary Sanctions: The G7 has imposed secondary sanctions to target countries or entities that help Russia evade sanctions. This includes sanctions on countries like China, Turkey, and Middle Eastern states that have facilitated trade with Russia. Additionally, Russia’s MoEX (Moscow Exchange), which handles a large portion of Russia’s foreign exchange transactions, has been sanctioned, further complicating trade for Russia. These sanctions have contributed to the weakening of the Russian ruble, which now has multiple exchange rates, a sign of economic instability. The discussion suggests that these economic pressures may be contributing to discontent among Russian elites and business leaders.

    • Impact on Trade: The sanctions, particularly on third-party countries, have led to a significant reduction in trade with Russia. As sanctions on Russian foreign exchange transactions take hold, countries are finding it harder to conduct trade, which is reflected in the drop of the ruble’s value.

    3. Military Operations and the Kers Incursion

    • Ukrainian Offensive in Kursk: The Ukrainian incursion into the Russian region of Kursk has not significantly altered the tactical situation in the eastern front, particularly in Donetsk. However, it has disrupted Russian military operations by forcing Russia to shift units from other regions to address the incursion. This shift may spoil Russia’s future military plans, even if the immediate effects on the battlefield are minimal. The repositioning of forces complicates Russia’s ability to plan long-term operations, particularly after the current offensive in Bakhmut and other eastern areas concludes.

    • Operational Impact on Russia: The speakers discuss how the Kursk incursion has forced Russia to pull troops from lower-priority areas, impacting their operational strategy. Russia follows a military doctrine where different units are rotated in and out of combat to prevent exhaustion. The Ukrainian incursion has disrupted this rotation, particularly in the South and Luhansk regions, which could affect Russia’s ability to sustain future operations. This disruption may prevent Russia from executing future campaigns as planned, even if the tactical situation on the ground remains unchanged.

    • Russian Military Doctrine: There is also an in-depth discussion of Russian military doctrine, particularly the concept of "operational art" (operatsionnoye iskusstvo), which involves planning campaigns in a way that prevents exhaustion by rotating combat units. The Ukrainian incursion has caused Russia to strip away elements of this doctrine, degrading their future operational capabilities. The Russian forces may not be able to implement their intended future campaigns as planned, particularly if they lack fresh troops to rotate into combat.

    4. Putin’s Domestic Challenges and Concerns

    • Avoiding General Mobilization: One of Putin’s key domestic challenges is avoiding a general mobilization that would involve conscripting young men from Moscow and St. Petersburg, which could lead to a political backlash. The Russian government is conscious of the fact that bringing the realities of the war to these major cities could spark widespread dissent, as the impact of casualties becomes harder to conceal.

    • Political Pressure on Putin: There is significant domestic pressure on Putin and his military leaders to deliver results before the winter, especially in the Donbass region. The conversation notes that Putin’s push for military victories in certain areas, such as Bakhmut, is driven more by political concerns than by strategic importance. Despite the political desire for victories, these objectives are causing significant Russian casualties, with some analysts suggesting that Ukraine is deliberately drawing out Russian forces to inflict maximum damage.

    • Incorporating Veterans into Politics: The Kremlin is aware of the political liability that war veterans, particularly those with life-altering injuries, could pose. As a result, they have launched the “Times of Heroes” initiative to integrate these veterans into political life. This is seen as a way to co-opt potential dissent by giving veterans a role in governance, thereby preventing them from becoming a critical voice against the war.

    • Sanctions on Russian Regional Elections: Putin has avoided drawing attention to the conflict in Kursk, including by keeping the current acting governor in place, despite the incursion. This strategy seems designed to normalize the situation in Kursk and avoid raising public awareness of the military setbacks in the region.

    5. Western Military and Political Strategy

    • US and Western Support: There’s a lengthy discussion on the West’s military and political strategy, particularly from the United States. The conversation highlights mixed signals from the U.S., with some policymakers pushing for stronger support for Ukraine, while others advocate for negotiations. The debate over the provision of advanced missiles to Ukraine is mentioned, with some officials fearing escalation if Ukraine uses these missiles to strike Russian territory.

    • Impact of U.S. Presidential Elections: The upcoming U.S. presidential election is seen as critical to Ukraine’s future. If Trump wins, there is concern that U.S. support for Ukraine could diminish drastically. On the other hand, a Harris victory would likely continue the current policy, although with potential shifts in tone and strategy.

    • Negotiation vs. Military Victory: There is concern that some voices in the West are pushing for a negotiated settlement, which could involve pressuring Ukraine to concede territory, such as Crimea. This sentiment is juxtaposed with military realities, where Russia’s control over Ukraine remains limited, and its military has suffered significant losses. However, the hesitation to supply all necessary military aid, like long-range missiles, is seen as a sign of a half-hearted commitment to ensuring Ukraine’s victory.

    • NATO and EU Membership for Ukraine: The discussion also touches on the issue of Ukraine’s potential NATO and EU membership, which would be a significant victory for Ukraine, even if it cannot reclaim all its territory. There is concern that countries like Hungary or Slovakia could block Ukraine’s NATO application, leading to a diplomatic impasse. These issues need to be addressed now to avoid complications at the end of the war.

    • Western Inattention to Other Conflicts: The conversation also mentions other regions where Russia is making gains, such as Georgia and Moldova. Elections in both countries could result in increased Russian influence, but there is little sign that the West is paying sufficient attention to these developments.

    6. Concluding Thoughts

    The speakers express concern that Russia’s full attention is on Ukraine, while Western nations view the conflict as just one of many priorities. For Russia, this war is its number one focus, while the West remains distracted by other issues like the economy and domestic politics. The lack of a cohesive long-term strategy for supporting Ukraine financially and militarily, and the hesitance to engage in broader strategic planning (e.g., for post-war NATO membership), could ultimately benefit Russia.

    In summary, the video emphasizes the need for more comprehensive and decisive financial and military support for Ukraine, highlighting concerns about the West’s piecemeal approach, Russia’s domestic challenges, and the broader geopolitical stakes at play. The conversation also touches on the potential implications of future U.S. elections, which could dramatically alter the course of the war.

     

    • Liker 2
    • Innsiktsfullt 1
  5. 12 hours ago, paatur said:

    https://www.nettavisen.no/okonomi/russlands-krigsokonomi-blomstrer/s/5-95-2018844
     

    Hvorfor Sanksjoner ikke virker. 
     

    I takt med at EU innførte nye sanksjoner mot Russland, økte eksporten fra Europa til land som Tyrkia, Armenia, Aserbajdsjan og Georgia med 50 prosent fra 2021 til 2023.

     

     

    Det samme gjorde disse landenes egen eksport til Russland. 

    Armenia doblet fra 2021 til 2023 sin import av kjemikalier fra Europa, femdoblet importen av IT-utstyr og firedoblet importen av annen elektronikk.

    Ja slik har det dessverre vært. Sanksjonene er ikke vanntette. Men betyr det at de ikke virker?

    Det var nettopp slikt en ønsket å ramme med sekundærsanksjoner. Hvor godt sekundærsanksjoner virker vet vi jo ikke ennå. Vi har sett at banker i blant annet kina er redd for å bli sanksjonerte slik at de i stor grad har stoppet transaksjoner til russland. Men å plugge alle hull for import av forbudte varer til russland det er nok dessverre en umulighet. Skallselskaper i skatteparadiser og skjult eierstruktur gjør det umulig å få tette alle hull. Men om sekundærsanksjoner brukes hardt og nådeløst fremover vil nok mange nasjoner droppe all eksport til russland av frykt for selv å bli rammet av sanksjoner. 

    Se på andre forbud, feks narkotika. Forbudt stort sett overalt. Likevel er det millioner av mennesker som arbeider med alt fra dyrking/produksjon av narkotika til smugling og distribusjon av narkotika. Og det skjer over hele kloden, tross forbud, gode rutiner hos tollerne og politi. Likevel selges det narkotika i hver minste avkrok omtrent over hele kloden. 

    Slik vil det nok være med varer russerne trenger, sålenge russerne betaler godt er det alltids mennesker som er villige til å gå langt for å få kloa i putins penger. 

    Men sekundærsanksjoner vil legge til et ekstra hindre for russerne, det gjør innkjøp av forbudte varer som elektronikk osv langt vanskeligere og det vil også drive kostnaden vesentlig opp. Og sålenge vi håndhever sekundærsanksjoner vil også produsentene av disse bli nødt til å stramme inn rutiner på hvem de selger til. 

    Sanksjonene kan omgåes, men det er både kostnadsdrivende og også kompliserende og vil helt sikkert ta lengre tid å få inn de varene russland trenger. Nå som sekundærsanksjoner er på plass tror jeg vi vil se at effekten av sanksjonene vil øke fremover, og risikoen for å selv bli sanksjonert øker og dermed vil flere droppe handel med russerne. 

    • Innsiktsfullt 3
  6.  

     

    AI sammendrag:

    Spoiler

    Introduction

    The video, hosted by Dennis, covers recent updates from Ukraine, particularly focusing on the latest military developments in the Kursk region, and offers insights into the broader geopolitical landscape surrounding the conflict.

    Situation in Kursk Region

    Dennis reports a significant development in the Kursk Oblast, where Russian forces have occupied the village of Snizhne. Despite this advance, Ukraine has mounted a counteroffensive that threatens to trap Russian forces in the region. Ukrainian forces are nearing the town of Glushkovo, which, if captured, would create a potential encirclement of Russian troops. Dennis suggests that the Russians may have fallen into a tactical trap laid by the Ukrainian military.

    Although Russian forces have gained some ground, their actions may expose them to greater risks, especially if Ukrainian forces continue to advance and cut off their supply lines. The more Russian troops that are deployed to the region, the more likely they are to become encircled, which would represent a major setback for Russia.

    Ukrainian Military Strategy

    According to Ukrainian military command hints, the current Russian counteroffensive in the Kursk region might actually be part of a larger Ukrainian strategy. The ultimate goal is to entrap Russian forces in the area, which would significantly weaken their operational capacity. Dennis is optimistic that the Ukrainian strategy will succeed, but the outcome will be clearer in the coming days.

    Ukraine has already recaptured the village of Velyka and is closing in on Glushkovo. The fight for control of the secondary Russian defense line in the region is expected to be intense, and Dennis believes the decisive battle will occur soon.

    Russian Forces Facing Challenges

    Despite some Russian success in pushing forward, their efforts are hampered by logistical issues, especially after Ukrainian forces destroyed key bridges. This disruption limits Russia's ability to rapidly reinforce its troops, leading to slower operations in the Kursk region. Russian channels continue to broadcast narratives of success, but Dennis asserts that the real picture is grim for Russian forces.

    Some Russian military bloggers have acknowledged the breakthrough of Ukrainian forces and the threat posed to the Russian grouping in the south of the Kursk region. Logistical challenges, such as resupplying troops and fuel shortages, are further complicating Russia’s offensive efforts.

    Ukrainian Drone and Ground Operations

    Ukrainian forces are actively using drones in the Kursk region to target Russian military equipment, particularly armored vehicles and artillery systems. Footage shared on the video shows successful Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian BMP vehicles and artillery positions. In addition, Ukrainian troops have captured several Russian soldiers and a T-72B3 tank, one of Russia’s more advanced tank models.

    Ukrainian troops are continuing their counteroffensive operations in the region, and the rapid pace of these advances is reminiscent of Ukraine’s earlier successes in the Kharkiv region. Dennis notes that Russia was unprepared to defend the area effectively, leading to significant Ukrainian gains.

    Russian Counterattacks and Setbacks

    Dennis provides updates on Russian counterattacks, particularly in the Pokrovske and Bakhmut directions. Russia has gained some ground in these regions, but Ukrainian forces continue to defend key positions and inflict heavy losses on Russian troops. Despite Russian advances, their military strategy continues to rely on outdated tactics, which leads to repeated mistakes, such as concentrating convoys in easily targetable areas.

    Footage shared by Dennis shows Russian convoys being hit by Ukrainian artillery, with several vehicles destroyed. He expresses frustration that Russian generals continue to use such ineffective tactics, which result in heavy losses.

    Russian Army and Conscription Issues

    The video also highlights the plight of Russian conscripts who were recently returned to Russia in an exchange with Ukraine. According to reports, many of these conscripts will be sent back to the front lines, despite having little to no combat experience. Dennis points out that this is part of Russia’s ongoing problem with manpower shortages and the repeated deployment of untrained soldiers into combat situations.

    He also shares a video of a Russian soldier who recorded a message before his death, urging others not to join the Russian military. The soldier criticized the Russian command for sending troops into dangerous situations without proper planning or regard for their lives.

    Broader Geopolitical Updates

    Dennis touches on geopolitical developments, including the U.S. Congress’s discussion of extending the Presidential Drawdown Authority to continue supplying weapons to Ukraine through 2025. Although the chances of passing a large-scale military aid package are low, he remains hopeful that Ukraine will continue receiving support from Europe and other allies.

    French Equipment in Russian Military

    An investigative report uncovered that French company Thales has been supplying critical equipment to Russian military aircraft, despite sanctions. The equipment has been routed through third countries like Kazakhstan, which are not subject to the same sanctions. This equipment has been found in Russian Su-35 fighter jets, raising concerns about how Russia continues to obtain advanced technology for its military.

    Trump’s Position on Ukraine

    Dennis also comments on a statement made by U.S. politician J.D. Vance, who suggested that Donald Trump could negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine by bringing together Russia, Ukraine, and Europe for peace talks. Dennis dismisses this suggestion, arguing that Russia has no interest in peace and would only use a ceasefire to regroup and rearm. He expresses concern about the implications of U.S. political leaders advocating for negotiations that could weaken Ukraine’s position.

    Conclusion

    Dennis concludes the video by reiterating his support for Ukraine and encouraging viewers to stay informed about the conflict. He remains optimistic about Ukraine’s military strategy, particularly in the Kursk region, and believes that Russia’s mistakes will ultimately lead to significant gains for Ukraine.

     

    • Liker 6
    • Innsiktsfullt 1
  7. 31 minutes ago, Olek1970 said:

    Vi får håpe dette stemmer:

    The United States and the United Kingdom have granted Kyiv permission to strike targets in Russia's rear with long-range missiles, but this has not been officially announced, reports The Guardian.

    Det ble meldt sent i går kveld at USA ville avvente tillatelse for bruk av ATACMS mot dyptliggende mål i russland og først se an russernes reaksjonen på bruk av Storm Shadow. Men kun et par timer senere ble vel det egentlig dementert fra Britene og de sa ingenting er endret ennå. 

    Vi får vel rett og slett avvente og se hva de neste dagene og ukene bringer. 

    Det beste scenarioet er jo at ved hjelp av long range missiler så får Ukraina i det minste tatt ut depoter for ballistiske missiler. Det er vel det som haster mest akkurat nå. Så får flystasjoner og flyoppstillingsplasser komme etterhvert. 

    Om det stemmer at tillatelse nå er gitt, så gjenstår jo ennå spørsmålet om hvor lang tid det tar før missilene ankommer Ukraina. Er dette noe som fraktes på skip over Atlanterhavet eller fyller de opp C-130 med missiler og flyr det ut? Må det gå sjøveien snakker vi fort 2-4 uker før ankomst. Tidligst. Det går naturligvis raskere å få sendt avgårde Storm Shadow. Men det er vel long range klasebomber Ukraina har ønsket seg aller mest? Og da blir det LR ATACMS. 

    • Liker 2
×
×
  • Opprett ny...