jjkoggan

Disney må fornøye barn og deres foreldrene som består av noe rundt 50% hvite,50% ikke hvite i Nord Amerika idag og snart øker til flertall ikke hvite. Det blir dårlig business å ignore gruppen som blir større og større og sette fokuset på gruppen som minsker. Den «store hvite majoriteten» er en myte i Nord-Amerika

Globalisering av fotball og PL har skjedd allerede. Det fører til konsekvenser som mange europeere skal mislike. Jeg støtter ikke PL kamper i usa selv men var intersert i hvorfor dere var imot det.

Det er uklart hva skadene er som du peker på med å fornøye fans som ikke klarer å reise til et annet land til å se deres lag live i deres land.

Norske PL fans ville bli misfornøyd hvis det ManU spilte en kamp i Oslo mot et annet PL lag?

Jeg sa ikke det var relevant. Jeg forklarte til Viftekopps spørsmål om hvorfor NFL fans ikke mener det er en stor sak når deres lag reiser til London kun for pengenes skyld. NFL fans i London er veldig glad i å se på dem spille live.

Sports lagene i usa må ofte reise store avstander Seattle til Orlando er 4100 km. Det gjør Boston-London ikke helt forskjellige for både fans og spillerne

Jeg tror ikke han tenker på det i denne konteksten fordi jegtror ikke han planlegger mye

En annen forklarelse Equality should be about giving everyone the same exact resources, whereas equity is about allocating those resources based on every individual's needs.

Ikke en stor sak for NFL fans var påstanden.

Han er ærlig, synes jeg. Du burde stemme denne gangen fordi det er meg, om 4år bryr jeg meg ikke for landet eller kandidaten fordi det har ingenting å gjøre med meg og min narsissist selv

Nivået i usa er irrelevant, EPL lag skal spille imot EPL lag i USA slik som NFL lag gjør hvert år i London. NFL fans er vant til det og det er ingen stor sak.

Så sier ordføreren til London Mayor of London asks why can’t US fans ‘benefit from a competitive game?’ London mayor Sadiq Khan has now claimed that it is inevitable for Premier League matches to be played abroad. While he addressed some concerns, the politician pointed at similar moves made by MLB and the NFL. “We’ve seen some other leagues across Europe have some of their competitive games held elsewhere,” Khan told the Sports Agents podcast. “All 32 NFL teams have now played in London and all of them have had a great experience. We have some of the top baseball teams now playing in London.”

Ingen segregering, alle kan bli med. Contacted by The Spectator, school officials said the course listings are inaccurate. No class is "restricted" by race, ethnicity or gender. However, certain sections are "intended to support" black or "Latinx" or black, male students. The school changed the course listings to drop "restricted," reports Athey. For example: “While open to all students, this optional section of the course is intended to support students who identify as Latinx,” one section of Algebra 2 states."

Jeg ser ingenting som reflekterer CRt i det du skriver

Du beskriver ikke CRT og nevner saker som ikke har noe å gjøre med det.

Kan du være «imot» en teori eller er du «uenig» i en teori? CRT er en forklaringsmodell som du kan mene er god forklaringsmodell eller ikke. Den er ikke en ideologi som beskriver hvordan du skal løse problemer som du kan støtte eller bli «imot».

Det er noe alvorlig galt når en prøver å bryte lover for å steal an election uansett hvordan de prøver å gjør det.

Using a legal strategy to attempt to corruptly nullify an election doesn't make it less of a soft coup. What really stinks are attempts to legitimize or undercut the seriousness of attempts to illegitimately overturn an election no matter what the means are.

Det er irrelevant til spørsmålet om det var et kuppforsøk eller ikke.

Hva hvis Pence bruker en AR 15 og skremmer de som prøver å gå? Ingen vet hvordan det ville gå men planen var å undergrave valgresultatene og gjør Trump som president, ikke bare stanse sertifiseringen og undersøke nærmere valgresultatene. Planen var et kuppforsøk, noe som heter en " soft coup". Hvis det ville ha fungert bra er en annen sak.

Nei- her var planen som trenger ingen støtte fra demokratene i teori VP Pence, presiding over the joint session (or Senate Pro Tempore Grassley, if Pence recuses himself), begins to open and count the ballots, starting with Alabama (without conceding that the procedure, specified by the Electoral Count Act, of going through the States alphabetically is required). When he gets to Arizona, he announces that he has multiple slates of electors, and so is going to defer decision on that until finishing the other States. This would be the first break with the procedure set out in the Act. At the end, he announces that because of the ongoing disputes in the 7 States, there are no electors that can be deemed validly appointed in those States. That means the total number of "electors appointed" – the language of the 12th Amendment – is 454. This reading of the 12th Amendment has also been advanced by Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe. A "majority of the electors appointed" would therefore be 228. There are at this point 232 votes for Trump, 222 votes for Biden. Pence then gavels President Trump as re-elected. Howls, of course, from the Democrats, who now claim, contrary to Tribe's prior position, that 270 is required. So Pence says, fine. Pursuant to the 12th Amendment, no candidate has achieved the necessary majority. That sends the matter to the House, where “the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote ..." Republicans currently control 26 of the state delegations, the bare majority needed to win that vote. President Trump is re-elected there as well. One last piece. Assuming the Electoral Count Act process is followed and, upon getting the objections to the Arizona slates, the two houses break into their separate chambers, we should not allow the Electoral Count Act constraint on debate to control. That would mean that a prior legislature was determining the rules of the present one – a constitutional no-no (as Tribe has forcefully argued). So someone – Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, etc. – should demand normal rules (which includes the filibuster). That creates a stalemate that would give the state legislatures more time to weigh in to formally support the alternate slate of electors, if they had not already done so. The main thing here is that Pence should do this without asking for permission – either from a vote of the joint session or from the Court. Let the other side challenge his actions in court, where Tribe (who in 2001 conceded the President of the Senate might be in charge of counting the votes) and others who would press a lawsuit would have their past position – that these are non-justiciable political questions – thrown back at them, to get the lawsuit dismissed. The fact is that the Constitution assigns this power to the Vice President as the ultimate arbiter. We should take all of our actions with that in mind.

Martin Luther King var en rasist, ifølge deg, ser det ut Do you feel it's fair to request a multibillion-dollar program of preferential treatment for the Negro, or for any other minority group?" King: "I do indeed. Can any fair-minded citizen deny that the Negro has been deprived?

It's a bit extreme to judge a person solely on who they voted for. You sound like a hell and damnation evangelical, Repent for your voting sins or suffer in hell!!! You might not realize that the word "repent" is rarely used outside religious settings. Good people make mistakes, sometimes repeatedly be they mistakes due to ignorance, moral lapses or irrational emotional reactions. There is much more to a persons life than politics.

Det er klokt å vise når en politiker bruker språk som Hitler brukte slik at vi kan hindre noe som ligner til Hitlers handlinger selv om i verste fall det motiverer noe KKK medlemmer i Charlottesville

If only party selection of a candidate was supposed to be a democratic process. Maybe biden will deliver a fiery speech to an armed, violent mob outside the convention in Chicago to disrupt the convention and try to reinstate Biden to make republicans more comfortable with the democratic process they purport to crave.