jjkoggan

No, institutional in this sense means it is established as a convention or norm in a culture, something that many ordinary people like teachers, nurses, police persons, doctors, real estate agents/salespeople etc.. do and establish it as a cultural norm that hinders minorities. It becomes so deeply embedded in a culture that many aren't aware it is happening. Certainly, but not seen as the only form of racism, nor as equally evil when it is a reaction to oppression. A slave who kills the brutal slave owner should not receive the same degree of punishment as the slave owner who kills the slave. Obviously I was talking about a western context. Discrimination based on race is racism even though power is a main component of institutional racism. The colonial era showed also that minorities can oppress other races with enough power. Even today the economic hegemony and influence of the western world often garners white privilege in the non-western world as it tries emulate the economic success of the west.

Culture/beliefs and practices that create institutional racism come from all corners of society, not just a chosen few elites as you repeatedly imply. And yes, interpersonal racism can be equally evil and tragic regardless of ethnicity. Again, interpersonal racism can be equally evil and tragic. A white hating Breivik could hurt just as many people as a black hating Breivik. The only superpower white people have is more social power to create and influence culture, attitudes, beliefs laws and practices than minorities that create institutional racism.

Libanesiske amerikaner trives like bra eller bedre enn norsk amerikanere, det samme gjelder iransk amerikanere. Hvis alt dreier seg rundt kultur, hvordan er det så?

No, because only white people are capable of shaping institutional racism except in very isolated environments in western societies. Greg will have a better shot at getting a job than Jamal no matter how often black people call the Greg’s of the world honkies, but the same is not true for Jamal. As far as interpersonal racism goes, both sides can be equally harmful, but the toolbox of epithets for black people to use against whites is weak and limited due mostly to the lack of historical oppression whites have suffered from blacks. I doubt many white Americans even know what the slurs against whites are, they are so impotent and imprecise.

Skoleskyteren i Florida hadde norsk statsborgerskap Leon County court records show that Ikner’s biological mother was accused of taking him to Norway when he was 10 years old, in violation of a custody agreement. The court documents refer to the child as Christian Eriksen, and say that he and his biological mother are both dual US-Norwegian citizens. President Donald Trump kaller skytingen «en skam, en fryktelig ting», men sier at amerikanere må få beholde fri tilgang til våpen.

Every instance of racial slurs against minorities reinforces negative stereotypes and is either neutral or contributes to negative consequences for minorities in general. This is not true for racial slurs against whites in the western world.

In racialized western social systems, racial slurs and stereotypes applied to whites by nonwhites do not carry the same meanings or outcomes as they do when these roles are swapped. That is, racial epithets directed toward whites are unlikely to affect their life chances in the same way that racial epithets directed toward minorities do

It's not morally equivalent to attack people that belong to marginalized groups as it is for marginalized groups to attack those who marginalize them. Kicking someone while they are down is not morally equivalent to kicking someone when they tower over you. Both actions are immoral but not equivalent.

?Spiller kontekst ingen rolle når du vurdere rasistiske ytringer? Alt burde ses "på lik linje"? Når din kultur og din folkegruppen ses som annerledes og har blit undertrykket i lang tid så er slemme ord om ens bakgrunn mer skadende enn omvendt i de fleste tilfeller, ikke bare for individet men også for folkegruppen deres generelt fordi det bidrar til negative stereotyper som kan føre til mer rasediskriminering, Muhammed har det vanskeligere å finne jobb enn Knut bare pga navnet sitt, for eksempel delvis pga negative stereotyper. Negative stereotyper mot hvite har ikke det samme effekten fordi i den vestlige verden å bli hvit er normalt og vi har en tendens å se på hverandre som individer. Et godt eksempel er motstanden i Norge til å kalle alle statsborgere for nordmenn og isteden er statsborgere annen og tredje generasjons innvandrere. Finnes det en bedre måte å vise hvem som er "annerledes"

Spørsmålet er hvis slike lover krever en super majoritet(60) i senatet, da kan demokratene drepe det

Fortsetter dette så taper republikanerne i kongressen i 2026 og makten skifter betydelig

Motstanden vokser… President Donald Trump has broken records with a historically low net approval rating among independent voters over the economy, according to CNN data analyst Harry Enten New aggregate polling has found that President Trump has broken his previous approval rating of negative 16% among independents and has dropped a whopping8% to negative 22% in 2025, breaking "his own record. https://www.themirror.com/news/politics/trump-hit-worst-ever-approval-1094505.amp

Ikke alle(resten) stemte på Trump.

Resten av landet lar det skjer Not even close.

Det KAN være alt mulig. FBI statistkkene gjelder rasisme som har blitt bevist, ikke spekulasjon Når du har begrenset resursser så må du fokus på de største problemene. Jeg tror ikke du forstår hvordan systemisk rasisme fungerer.