jjkoggan

Swapping colors can be very $$$ popular if it’s done right Hamilton eller Askepott for eksempel

I disagree, woke is too nebulous and subjective a concept to be restrictive up front.

The most productive brainstorming happens when there are no limitations, not when limitations are imposed up front in the process . Limitations, however can be placed after the creative process has generated ideas. This process then negates your fear that unpopular products will be marketed but keeps artistic freedom vibrant

Trump tåler ikke de som får mer oppmerksomhet enn ham og Musk tåler ikke å bli 2nd in command. Det er som å sette en gorilla og tiger i samme buret og tro de skal samarbeide

Du antar at det ikke er en fordel å tilhøre det samme etnisk gruppen til etnisk gruppene markedskreftene krever du skal skrive historier om.

I dag reiste jeg til Norge med bil uten å ta fly eller båt Jeg visste ikke at Norge ligger i Virginia og ingen snakker norsk i landsbyen! (Byen heter Norge, ikke Norway forresten) Det uttales Norsj som ge I forge https://tv.nrk.no/serie/korrespondentbrev-fra-usa/sesong/1985/episode/FNYH70005085?autoplay=

En ting er sikkert- it will end badly

So much for the landslide victory, he can’t even get his own party to support him!

I thought Trump was this master negotiator? Actually he is a better chaos machine who doesn’t play attention until the last minute. This way he gets what he wants most of all- attention!

Budskapet oppsummeres i de første setningene Our poll, the first postelection poll specifically focused on trust in government, reveals that while voters are less trusting of the government as a result of the election, they believe the government will be more effective and can get things done. Put another way, our poll suggests that Democrats ran the wrong campaign. Whereas they ran a “values campaign,” focused on a government Americans could trust, what voters really wanted was an effective government, and on that, they preferred Donald Trump. Resten av artikkelen bare viser hvorfor denne tesen er korrekt og muligens årsaken de mener hva de mener

Du har ikke lest den Eastman memo, ser det ut. In that context, John C. Eastman tried to convince Pence that he could overturn the election results on January 6, 2021 (when Congress counted the Electoral College votes) by throwing out electors from "7 states" – presumably Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, along with either New Mexico or the federal district Washington, D.C. Slates of electors declaring Trump the winner were submitted from the seven states, but the National Archives did not accept the unsanctioned documents and they did not explicitly enter the deliberations.[17][18][19] Under Eastman's scheme, Pence would have declared Trump the winner with more Electoral College votes after the seven states were thrown out, at 232 votes to 222 https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/20/politics/trump-pence-election-memo/index.html

Nei. Helt feil. Jeg kan fikse din mistillit i mitt arbeid med å vise deg det som jeg har gjort bra som kanskje du ikke had visst noe om før. Staten kan fikse mistillit i staten med å slutte å gjøre det som gir mistillit og gjør mer av det som skaper tillit og kommunisere det på bedre måter til alle. Tiltak som gjør folk rikere og reduserer fattigdom, for eksempel skaper tillit i staten.

Eastmans plan var at Pence ville telle de fake electors og Trump ville blitt president. Hva ville skjedd vet ingen men at det var et selvkuppforsøk som Eastman planla er åpenbar.

Han ba Pence å ikke telle stemmene han ikke likte slik at kunne endre valgresultatet med sine «fake electors»

Feil- de ga kongressen denne retten, ikke Vpen. Det er grunnen til Electoral Count Reform Act ble godkjent