jjkoggan

Fortsetter dere å kjøpe Gillette, Oral B produkter?

Et nøyere kart

Det er sjelden blant de topp 5 sakene amerikanerne bryr seg om og lite enighet på mulige løsninger

Because he knows republicans can win just by energizing their base enough, something previous presidents thought was impossible. He also knows his base will punish him if he attempts compromise or reconciliation

Trump wanted Pence to nullify some electoral counts he didn't like and replace them with counts he did like. He staged a protest to encourage that to happen. When it became violent he delayed intervening for several hours most certainly because he thought they would succeed. This does not mean that he wanted the protest to be violent, only that he didn't care enough to intervene. Stopping the count also does not necessarily mean that it was a coup though replacing it with fake electors would be a soft coup if that was the intention. Stopping the count was his stated desire and he tried two ways, through a staged protest and through Pence. Reports say that he was told some of the protesters were armed, which he did nothing about. That does not mean necessarily that he wanted an armed rebellion but it does show that he didn't care very much about the potential. None of these things have ever been attempted by past presidents whether it was just a staged peaceful protest, riot, or coup.

Many strawmen I never said he staged a riot or coup. I never said he wanted a violent breach. I never said he was solely responsible for distrust. I never said he wanted Pence to cause a violent breach but we do know that he chose not to act quickly when people were shouting about killing Mike Pence and we know he wanted him to nullify votes he didn't like. These are strawmen you manufactured dishonestly or perhaps through ignorance.

Staged a protest Trump's tweet : Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!" Stage Definition 1.: to produce (something, such as a play) on a stage 2.: to produce or cause to happen for public view or public effect Strawman Another strawman No, it does not sterilize years of delegitimisation That is my standard When a president pressures his vice president to stop counting all the votes, it is logical that the president hoped a protest would successfully stop the counting. Another strawman. No president has ever come close to sowing as much distrust in government as trump.

Whatabout whatabout whatabout? Can you not see the forest for the trees? Hillary conceded, Trump did not. Hillary expressed doubt about the election , Trump staged a protest to block the election and when it turned violent refused to attempt to defuse it for several hours in hopes it would be successful. Even if they are comparable, which they are not, it does not make his behaviour less dangerous.

Kanskje Pochettino blir lei av USA og kommer tilbake til Tottenham

Jeg har ikke sagt at friheten er død eller at usa er autoritært selv om Trump ville helst bli en diktator eller kong.

Enig. En kan få resultater når man leder med frykt, men en får bedre resultater når man leder med respekt. Så snart en får et alternativ så svikter man lederen som bruker frykt som motivasjon. For det andre så blir man sterkere, ikke svakere når usa ses som en ærlig leder som ikke bare ser på egeninteresser. Som vi sier: You never know when you might need your friends

Trump er ikke ute etter penger i hovedsak, han er etter inntrykket blant sine tilhengere at Europa bidrar lite når usa prøver å beskytte vesten, at usa må bruke mer av sine egne penger og blod for å gjøre det. Faktumet at du kjøper amerikansk er bare en pluss, ikke hoved motivasjonen tror jeg, det blir mer komplisert enn Trump tenker å tro at kjøp av amerikanske våpen kommer først

Bush’s mannen Karl Rove mener disse demokrater kan bli gode kandidater. Beshear er en demokrat som en god del republikanere er glad i Rove identified Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey and Rahm Emanuel, describing them as “possible Democratic 2028 hopefuls” who are “outliers within their party.”

Når du benekter å fordømme en som du har middag med en klar rasist som politiker så gir du inntrykket at du ikke har noe imot rasister. Gjør du det ofte så forsterker du dette inntrykket. Motiv, karakter, holdning er en annen sak, men det er inntrykket som ødelegger, ikke hva motiverer eller hvilke holdninger lederen har. En trenger ikke klar bevis at presidenten er en rasist som du krever før du skal kritisere presidenten De siste presidentene oppførte seg som antirasister, ikke som noen som ikke hadde noe særlig imot rasister

En trenger ikke å bevise forhåndskap, en trenger bare å bevise reaksjonen etterpå. Istedenfor å fordømme Fuentes sin rasisme og beklage at han aldri villet hatt middag med en rasist så sier han bare at han ikke visste noe om ham som om han var bare en nabo han ikke kjente, ikke en velkjent rasist som han synes er forkastelig. Istedenfor gir han inntrykket at det er ingen stor sak å handle med rasister Alt dette ekskluderer faktumet at mange mente Ye var en antisemitt og han visste det på forhånd