Gå til innhold

Immanuel Kant

Medlemmer
  • Innlegg

    250
  • Ble med

  • Besøkte siden sist

Innlegg skrevet av Immanuel Kant

  1. har hørt at bønn skal være effektivt, har du prøvd det?

     

    prøv å snakke med han. ikke stress og mas om at du er bekymret. ikke snakk om selvmord og det at han har lyst til å ta sitt eget liv. snakk heller om positive ting. fortell han at du setter pris på han. snakk om det han er flink til, og de sidene ved han du respekterer. fortell han at mange har vært i hans situasjon og er i dag svært glade for at de ikke valgte å ta sitt eget liv. mitt beste tips, uten at jeg har vært i samme situasjon. heldigvis.

  2. To NORA

     

    Dublin 3 December 1909

     

     

     

    ……………………………….

     

    ……., you seem to turn me into a beast. It was you yourself, you naughty shameless girl who first led the way. It was not I who first touched you long ago down at Ringsend. It was you who slid your hand down down inside my trousers and pulled my shirt softly aside and touched my prick with your long tickling fingers and gradually took it all, fat and stiff as it was, into your hand and frigged me slowly until I came off through your fingers, all the time bending over me and gazing at me out of your quiet saintlike eyes. It was your lips too which first uttered an obscene word. I remember well that night in bed in Pola.

     

    Tired of lying under a man one night you tore off your chemise violently and got on top of me to ride me naked. You stuck my prick into your cunt and began to ride me up and down. Perhaps the horn I had was not big enough for you for I remember that you bent down to me face and murmured tenderly "Fuck up, love! Fuck up, love!"

     

    Nora dear, I am dying all day to ask you one or two questions. Let me, dear, for I have told you everything I ever did and so I can ask you in turn. When that person (Vincent Cosgrave) whose heart I long to stop with the click of a revolver put his hand or hands under your skirts did he only tickle you outside or did he put his finger or fingers up into you? If he did, did they go up far enough to touch that little cock at the end of your cunt? Did he touch you behind? Was he a long time tickling you and did you come? Did he ask you to touch him and did you do so? If you did not touch him did he come against you and did you feel it?

     

    Another question, Nora. I know that I was the first man that blocked you but did any man ever frig you? Did that boy (Michael Bodkin) you were fond of ever do it? Tell me now, Nora, truth for truth, honesty for honesty. When you were with him in the dark at night did your fingers never, never unbutton his trousers and slip inside like mice? Did you ever frig him, dear, tell me truly or anyone else? Did you never, never, never feel a man's or a boy's prick in your fingers until you unbuttoned me? If you are not offended do not be afraid to tell me the truth. Darling, darling, tonight I have such a wild lust for your body that if you were here beside me and even if you told me with your lips that half the redheaded louts in the county Galway had had a fuck at you before me I would still rush at you with desire.

     

    …………………………………………………….

     

     

    To NORA

     

    Dublin 6 December 1909

     

     

     

    ………………………………..

     

    I would like you to wear drawers with three or four frills one over the other at the knees and up the thighs and great crimson bows in them, I mean not schoolgirls' drawers with a thin shabby lace border, thigh round the legs and so thin that the flesh shows with a full loose bottom and wide legs, all frills and lace and ribbons, and heavy with perfume so that whenever you show them, whether in pulling up your clothes hastily to do something or cuddling yourself up prettily to be blocked, I can see only a swelling mass of white stuff and frills and so that when I bend down over you to open them and give you a burning lustful kiss on your naughty bare bum I can smell the perfume of your drawers as well as the warm odour of your cunt and the heavy smell of your behind.

     

    Have I shocked you by the dirty things I wrote to you? You think perhaps that my love is a filthy thing. It is, darling, at some moments. I dream of you in filthy poses sometimes. I imagine things so very dirty that I will not write them until I see how you write yourself. The smallest things give me a great cockstand - a whorish movement of your mouth, a little brown stain on the seat of your white drawers, a sudden dirty word spluttered out by your wet lips, a sudden immodest noise made by you behind and then a bad smell slowly curling up out of your backside. At such moments I feel mad to do it in some filthy way, to feel your hot lecherous lips sucking away at me, to fuck between your two rosy-tipped bubbies, to come on your face and squirt it over your hot cheeks and eyes, to stick it between the cheeks of your rump and bugger you.

     

    Basta per stasera!

     

    I hope you got my telegram and understood it.

     

    Goodbye, my darling whom I am trying to degrade and deprave. How on God's earth can you possibly love a thing like me?

     

    O, I am anxious to get your reply, darling!

     

    JIM

     

     

     

    To NORA

     

    Dublin 8 December 1909

     

     

     

    My sweet little whorish Nora I did as you told me, you dirty little girl, and pulled myself off twice when I read your letter. I am delighted to see that you do like being fucked arseways. Yes, now I can remember that night when I fucked you for so long backwards. It was the dirtiest fucking I ever gave you, darling. My prick was stuck in you for hours, fucking in and out under your upturned rump. I felt your fat sweaty buttocks under my belly and saw your flushed face and mad eyes. At every fuck I gave you your shameless tongue came bursting out through your lips and if a gave you a bigger stronger fuck than usual, fat dirty farts came spluttering out of your backside. You had an arse full of farts that night, darling, and I fucked them out of you, big fat fellows, long windy ones, quick little merry cracks and a lot of tiny little naughty farties ending in a long gush from your hole. It is wonderful to fuck a farting woman when every fuck drives one out of her. I think I would know Nora's fart anywhere. I think I could pick hers out in a roomful of farting women. It is a rather girlish noise not like the wet windy fart which I imagine fat wives have. It is sudden and dry and dirty like what a bold girl would let off in fun in a school dormitory at night. I hope Nora will let off no end of her farts in my face so that I may know their smell also.

     

    You say when I go back you will suck me off and you want me to lick your cunt, you little depraved blackguard. I hope you will surprise me some time when I am asleep dressed, steal over to me with a whore's glow in your slumberous eyes, gently undo button after button in the fly of my trousers and gently take out your lover's fat mickey, lap it up in your moist mouth and suck away at it till it gets fatter and stiffer and comes off in your mouth. Sometimes too I shall surprise you asleep, lift up your skirts and open your drawers gently, then lie down gently by you and begin to lick lazily round your bush. You will begin to stir uneasily then I will lick the lips of my darling's cunt. You will begin to groan and grunt and sigh and fart with lust in your sleep. Then I will lick up faster and faster like a ravenous dog until your cunt is a mass of slime and your body wriggling wildly.

     

    Goodnight, my little farting Nora, my dirty little fuckbird! There is one lovely word, darling, you have underlined to make me pull myself off better. Write me more about that and yourself, sweetly, dirtier, dirtier.

     

     

    JIM

  3. her er forøvrig min/én topp 5:

     

    mekons

    albert ayler

    minutemen

    masayuki takayanagi

    napalm death

     

    y: nei

    n: mekons (omg?), napalm death (eh..), resten

     

    ditt menneskeverd, kjære Kant, er 0.2

    Ok, så du sier faktisk at andre mennesker er mindre verdt fordi musikken de hører på er svak? Hvorfor tror du at folk er mindre verd fordi DU ikke liker musikken deres? FORKLAR FOR SVARTE.

  4. synes ikke lesing i seg selv har noen særlig verdi. det er innholdet som har noen verdi eller ikke. det å lese dan brown vil jeg sidestille meg å se på 24 eller annet intetsigende møl på tv. selvfølgelig ingenting galt med å gjøre det (hjernedød underholdning er gjerne gunstig etter en lang og slitsom dag), men å innbille seg at man utvikler seg som menneske ved å lese, uavhengig av hva man leser, synes jeg høres lite plausibelt ut.

  5. og for å være litt "kontroversiell": selv om han hadde vært "pedofil" så tar jo ikke barn skade av å bli fotografert. spesielt ikke dersom de ikke vet om det selv engang.
    Den der ble litt for filosofisk for meg.

     

    La meg snu det på hodet. Ville du synes det var greit at en gammel siklende gubbe kikka på deg i dusjen med en vissen snabel i hånda, selv om du teoretisk ikke var klar over det?

     

    Hvis svaret er nei, så bør du kanskje tenke litt grundigere over hvorfor du ikke synes det er greit.

    dersom jeg ikke registrerte det?

     

    det kan det jo hende har hendt allerede. uten at det er noe jeg har tatt skade av. så ja, det hadde selvsagt vært greit.

  6. Det er ganske irriterande å finne ein diskusjon i ein tråd som har null og niks med emnet å gjere. Det er mykje ein kan poste som ikkje er lovstridig (4chan-materiale), men det er likevel smaklaust og tragisk (imo).

    som sagt, dette er mine personlige preferanser. jeg respekterer at andre har forskjellige preferanser. men personlig klarer jeg hverken å bli irritert av innlegg som er off-topic eller å bli støtt av "smakløst" materiale.

  7. Guds-fornektere (ateister)

    påstår du her at ateisme er å fornekte guds eksistens?

     

    Ja, det er vertfall den definisjonen jeg har hørt.

    det er ulike former for ateisme. egentlig synes jeg hele begrepet er håpløst og upresist. jeg definerer uansett min egen ateisme som fraværet av en tro på gud, ikke en tro (som i å "vite") på at gud faktisk ikke eksisterer

     

    gud kan ikke motbevises. det at jeg er gud kan heller ikke motbevises. jeg finner begge like usannsynlig, men jeg påstår ikke å vite noe jeg ikke har forutsetning for å vite

  8. Religiøse har forbud mot umoral. Ateister har ikke dette, slik ateisme er i seg selv.

    kjære bellicus. "moral" er ikke noe absolutt. innenfor din religion er den kanskje det, men ikke for oss andre.

     

    Er du sikker på dette? Sokrates er ihvertfall uenig.

     

    "Sokrates var absolutist. Han mente det fantes universelle verdier og normer. Han prøvde å komme frem til allmenngyldige definisjoner av begreper som godhet, sannhet og rettferdighet. Sokrates mente at riktig kunnskap (episteme) førte til riktig handling. Riktig handling førte igjen til lykke. Derfor var begrepsanalyse så viktig. Begrepsanalyse ga kunnskap, som igjen ga kunnskapsbæreren god moral og gjorde ham lykkelig. Dette bidro til å gjøre samfunnet bedre. Sokrates’ tanker og liv har vært en inspirasjonskilde for ettertidens filosofer."

     

    Om du eller Sokrates har rett er vel egentlig umulig å svare på. Jeg har ihvertfall alltid likt Sokrates sitt syn på bla annet lykke.

     

    Så er det store sprøsmålet. Er en religiøs i besittelse av riktig kunnskap? Mest sannsynlig ikke iom at vi har sett mange 100 om ikke 1000 forskjellige religioner opp gjennom tidene.

    vel, jeg personlig har aldri hatt særlig sansen for det deontologiske synet på etikk og moral. herav ironien i valg av brukernavn. men selvsagt, alle har ulikt syn på dette.

×
×
  • Opprett ny...